What is the impact of Youngs Modulus on copper cable torqueing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MandyVol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Modulus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of Young's Modulus on the torqueing of 16mm copper cables in box terminals, specifically at a torque of 4Nm. It concludes that the modulus of elasticity is relevant but not the sole factor in torque retention; the deformation of copper during torqueing leads to a need for re-torqueing. The yield strength of copper is low, causing it to yield under load, which may necessitate periodic re-tightening. Over-torqueing above 4Nm may help stabilize the connection and reduce the frequency of re-torqueing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's Modulus and its application in materials science
  • Knowledge of torque specifications and their implications in electrical engineering
  • Familiarity with the mechanical properties of copper, including yield strength and work hardening
  • Basic principles of fatigue in materials under alternating stress
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of over-torqueing on copper cable connections
  • Investigate methods to measure and analyze yield strength in copper
  • Learn about fatigue analysis in materials subjected to alternating stresses
  • Explore alternative fastening techniques for copper cables in high-current applications
USEFUL FOR

Production engineers, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in the installation and maintenance of high-current copper cable connections will benefit from this discussion.

MandyVol
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I hope someone can help. I am an Production Engineer. We have a situation where we have to torque a 16mm copper cable in a box terminal by 4Nm. The cable will be used to carry a high electrical current.

We find that after torqueing (About 5 hours or so) the terminal can be re-tightened back to 4Nm.

I am told this is to do with Youngs Modulus and the characteristics of copper.
I have taken a look at Youngs Modulus but it all seems centred around the stretching of copper and not the compression / "squashing" of copper.

Would anyone know how to work out:
1. What interval we should wait before re-torque,
2. How many times you would need to re-torque,
3. Is re-torque the best option or is there an alternative.
4. Am I even on the right track with regards to Youngs Modulus or are there any other suggestions?

Any assitance would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Mandy,
The modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus) is the same in both tension and compression, but the reason for the relaxing of the torque isn't due to the modulus. If the stress on the copper doesn't exceed yield during operation, it shouldn't require retorquing, but I suspect because the yield strength for copper is so low that it is being deformed when torquing and again to a small degree during operation.

As you crush (or stretch) a material like copper, it work hardens, so the yield strength increases. There's a risk of fatigue if there are alternating stresses in the material, but I suspect the alternating stresses are low and can be ignored. You'd need to look at that separately. The more important issue is getting the material to stop yielding during operation. Perhaps by overtorquing the copper to well above 4 Nm (if it can handle it) then removing the load and reapplying to 4 Nm, it might not need periodic retightening. Otherwise, I suspect you will need to retorque a number of times, each time you'll find it being a bit tighter than previously and eventually it won't need to be retightened at all. But I think it's getting loose over time because the copper is yielding.

If you try this, let me know as I'd be interested in your results. I have a similar issue using annealed copper.
 
Thanks a lot! I will try this and let you know if it works, any other suggestions will still be appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
56K