What is the Integral of x^{2} e^{-x^2} dx in Signal Processing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter niks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of \( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{2} e^{-x^{2}} dx \) is evaluated using the Gamma function, yielding \( \frac{1}{2}\Gamma\left(\frac{3}{2}\right) = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} \). The discussion highlights that the anti-derivative is not an elementary function, necessitating the use of limits for definite integrals. Techniques such as integration by parts and the error function, Erf(x), are discussed as methods to approach the problem. The consensus is that recognizing the integral's relation to Gaussian distributions simplifies the evaluation in signal processing contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and limits
  • Familiarity with the Gamma function and its properties
  • Knowledge of the error function, Erf(x)
  • Basic concepts of signal processing and Gaussian distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Gamma function and its applications in integrals
  • Learn about the error function and its significance in probability and statistics
  • Explore integration techniques, particularly integration by parts and Leibniz's rule
  • Investigate the role of Gaussian distributions in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, signal processing engineers, and students studying advanced calculus or probability theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in evaluating complex integrals.

niks
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
I ran into an integral while working on response of a signal processing filter, it looks like:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{2} e^{-x^{2}} dx

While trying integration by parts u = x^{2} we get du = 2xdx but can't proceed with dv = e^{-x^{2}} because then
v = \int e^{-x^{2}}
can't be integrated unless we use the limits.

Can anyone suggest an approach for this?

Thanks,
Niks
 
  • Like
Likes Bruno Cavalcante and Ranvir
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly are you trying to do? As you point out, your v is not any elementary function, and that tells you that neither is
\int x^2e^{-x^2} dx
You might be able to do that in terms of the "error function", Erf(x), which is defined to be
\int e^{-x^2} dx
 
If you just want to calculate the definite integral, I don't see why you wouldn't want to include the limits when integrating by parts?
 
His point, about the limits of integration, was that it is well known that
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{x^2}dx= 2\sqrt{\pi}[/itex]<br /> while the anti-derivative is not an elementary function. in other words, he could, theoretically, do it as a definite integral with the right limits but not as an indefinite integral.
 
Was that adressed to me?

Anyway, Maple tells me that:
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{n} e^{-x^{2}}\rm{d} x=\frac{1}{2}\Gamma\left(\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(1+(-1)^n\right) <br /> ,
which should be possible to prove by induction.

PS. HallsofIvy: You have forgotten the minus-sign in your integrand.
 
A cute way to solve this is to recall that

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-ax^2}=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{\sqrt{a}}

Then use Feynman's favorite trick and differentiate both sides with respect to a, and evaluate at a = 1.
 
  • Like
Likes Curieuse and Ranvir
HallsofIvy said:
His point, about the limits of integration, was that it is well known that
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{x^2}dx= 2\sqrt{\pi}[/itex]<br /> while the anti-derivative is not an elementary function. in other words, he could, theoretically, do it as a definite integral with the right limits but not as an indefinite integral.
<br /> For one, it&#039;s e^{-x^2} and for two, it&#039;s \sqrt{\pi}.
 
As you point out, your v is not any elementary function,
I think I should use this as a guideline for future problems. Both u and v should be elementary functions otherwise integration by parts becomes too messy(perhaps impossible).

while the anti-derivative is not an elementary function. in other words, he could, theoretically, do it as a definite integral with the right limits but not as an indefinite integral.
Yes, that was what I had in mind. That's why I got stuck there.

Anyway, Maple tells me that:
<br /> <br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{n} e^{-x^{2}}\rm{d} x=\frac{1}{2}\Gamma\left(\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\r ight)\left(1+(-1)^n\right) <br /> <br />
which should be possible to prove by induction.
Thanks! That will help me move forward.

Thanks to everyone who replied, I learned a lot from this thread.

-Niks
 
Using lots of substitutions and integration by parts I get this:

\int x^{2}e^{-{x^2}}dx=xe^{x^{2}}\left[1-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\prod_{k=2}^{n}\left(2k-3\right)}{2^{n}x^{2n}}\right]

I would go over the derivation but LaTex is killing me.
 
  • #10
Quite frankly, I think using Leibniz' rule, as suggested by Nicksauce, would by far be the simplest method in this case.
 
  • #11
Quite frankly, I think using Leibniz' rule, as suggested by Nicksauce, would by far be the simplest method in this case.

Quite true.

But, if doing by parts, then the proper selection of u an dv is

u=x

dv= x*e^{-x^2}dx

and then things won't be so messy - however, it will involve the definite integral \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}{ e^{-{x^2}}dx} which we know equals \sqrt{\pi}.
 
  • Like
Likes Curieuse
  • #12
umm mathematica gives me \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}

and for the indefinite :

<br /> \frac{1}{4} \sqrt{\pi } \text{erf}(x)-\frac{1}{2} e^{-x^2} x<br />
 
  • #13
Well, perhaps the very simplest approach is to recognize that the integral is \sqrt{\pi} times the variance of a Gaussian random variable with mean 0 and standard deviation \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}. That's certainly all I'd bother doing in the signal processing context the OP mentioned.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K