What is the intuition behind using eigenvectors of AA^T and A^T A in the SVD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daviddoria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpretation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the intuition behind using the eigenvectors of the matrices AA^T and A^T A in Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). It establishes that when a vector x is multiplied by AA^T, it is projected into the column space of matrix A. The relationship between the inner products in vector spaces U and V is highlighted, emphasizing that A^T acts as a mapping from V back to U, akin to an inverse operation. This projection and mapping are crucial for understanding the orthogonal properties of the subspaces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
  • Familiarity with eigenvectors and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces
  • Basic concepts of linear transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of eigenvectors in the context of SVD
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of AA^T and A^T A
  • Learn about the orthogonal complement in vector spaces
  • Investigate applications of SVD in data compression and dimensionality reduction
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, data scientists, and machine learning practitioners seeking to deepen their understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly in relation to SVD and its applications in data analysis and transformation.

daviddoria
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
In the SVD, we use the eigenvectors of AA^T and A^T A as the input and output bases for the matrix. Does anyone have any intuition about these matrices? ie. if I multiply a vector x by AA^T, what space (in terms of the column space, etc. of A) will it bring x to?

Thanks,

Dave
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If A: U->V, that is, if A maps vector space U to vector space V, then A^T: V-> U so it acts "like" an inverse. The condition is that <Au, v>V= <u,A^Tv>V. Note that Au and V are in vector space V and u and A^Tv are in vector space U. That's why I put the "V" and "U" subscripts on the inner products- to indicate which space the inner product is defined in. Of course, an important application of inner product is to define "orthogonal" or perpendicular. If A maps U into a subspace of V, then all vectors, v, in the orthogonal complement of that subspace have the property that <Au,v>= 0. Since <Au,v>= 0= <u,A^Tv>, and u could be any member of U, it follows that A^Tv= 0 for v in the orthogonal complement of AU.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K