What is the Iron Mass in the Main Asteroid Belt?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dBrandon/dC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Belt Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The main asteroid belt contains an estimated total mass of 3.0 to 3.6 x 1021 kilograms, with approximately 10% of the asteroids classified as M-type, which are primarily composed of nickel-iron. This percentage refers to the count of asteroids rather than their mass. Other asteroid types, such as S-type (15%) and C-type (75%), also contribute to the overall composition, but the exact mass distribution remains uncertain. The aggregate iron content in the asteroid belt is likely comparable to that of Mars' crust, estimated at around 5%.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of asteroid classification (M, S, C types)
  • Familiarity with mass estimation techniques in astronomy
  • Knowledge of planetary geology, particularly Mars' crust composition
  • Basic comprehension of spectral characteristics in celestial bodies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the composition and characteristics of M-type asteroids
  • Explore the geological features of 4 Vesta and its nickel-iron core
  • Investigate mass distribution methods in asteroid belt studies
  • Learn about the implications of asteroid composition for planetary formation theories
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, planetary geologists, and space mission planners interested in asteroid composition and its implications for understanding the early solar system.

dBrandon/dC
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find how much iron (by mass) is in the main asteroid belt. I'm finding a lot of sites that say 10% of the asteroids are M class, but is that by number or by mass? Does anyone know, and can you provide a reference?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Population demographics of the asteroid belt
1] class M [metallic] 10%
2] class S [stony] 15%
3] class C [carbonaceous] 75%
These are by count and predominant spectral characteristics. The relative mass composition is not well known for obvious reasons. The aggregate iron content is probably about the same as that of Mars crust [estimated around 5%].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K