What is the justification for the branching ratios of tau lepton decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lepton Ratios
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the branching ratios of tau lepton decay, concluding with hadrons at 60%, and both the electron and muon at 20% each. The participants analyze the decay processes involving W bosons and the impact of the CKM matrix on these ratios. They emphasize the importance of density of states and the influence of kaons and quark colors in refining the calculations. The final consensus suggests that the branching ratios can be approximated more accurately by considering these factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics, specifically lepton and hadron decay processes.
  • Familiarity with the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix and its role in quark transitions.
  • Knowledge of density of states in particle decay scenarios.
  • Basic grasp of W boson decay mechanisms and their implications in lepton branching ratios.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the CKM matrix on particle decay rates in detail.
  • Research the role of density of states in multi-body decays, particularly in lepton channels.
  • Examine the effects of kaons and other mesons on branching ratios in tau decays.
  • Explore advanced calculations involving phase space factors in particle decays.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students studying advanced particle decay processes, and researchers focusing on lepton-hadron interactions will benefit from this discussion.

Fek
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Branching ratios of tau lepton decay:
hadrons 66%
muon 17%
electron 17%

Use your knowledge of the decay of W bosons to justify these rates.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The W+ boson can decay to any combination of quarks with +1 charge, but the CKM matrix suppresses many of these heavily, so let's just consider ud, us, cd, cs (where d/s are anti).

BR (electron) = g^2(w) / (3*((2g^2(w) cos^2x + 2g^2(w)sin^2x) + 2g^2(w)
= 1( 6 + 2) = 1/8

where g^2(w) cos^2x is the matrix element squared for ud and and cs
g^2(w)sin^2x is the matrix element squared for us and cd
g^2(w) is the matrix element squared for any lepton.

This doesn't give the right answer. Furthermore shouldn't density of states be very important given the fact that the lepton channel is 3 body, and in real life the tau decays into 3 or 4 particles most commonly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fek said:
so let's just consider ud, us, cd, cs (where d/s are anti).
You ignored tb for a good reason. There is something else you should ignore for the same reason.

Fek said:
This doesn't give the right answer. Furthermore shouldn't density of states be very important given the fact that the lepton channel is 3 body, and in real life the tau decays into 3 or 4 particles most commonly?
That is a smaller effect from hadronization.
 
I'm afraid I just can't see it. I'v
mfb said:
You ignored tb for a good reason. There is something else you should ignore for the same reason.

Many thanks for your reply. I can see I shouldn't have include the charm containing mesons as they are slightly to heavy. This brings the branching ratios to 50% hadrons and 25% for each lepton. Have I missed something else or is the remaining discrepancy justified by a density of states argument? Many thanks.
 
Fek said:
This brings the branching ratios to 50% hadrons and 25% for each lepton.
What happened to the quark colors now? The previous calculation seemed to have those.
 
Sorry made a silly mistake. So the BR should be 60% for hadrons and 20% for the electron
mfb said:
What happened to the quark colors now? The previous calculation seemed to have those.

Sorry made a silly mistake. BR should now be 60% for hadrons (3 * cos^2(x) + sin^2(x)) / (3 * (cos^2(x) + sin^2(x)) + 1 + 1 ) , and 20% for each lepton. Many thanks.
 
Right, and that is close to the actual values. You can get an even better approximation if you take kaons into account (with up, not with charm).
 
Have I not taken into account Kaons with the Cabibo factors (cos(x)) for non mixed states, and sin(x) for mixed states?
 
Well, I don't understand your numerator. Why is there no 3 for the sin term?
But sin and cos together should work, and give 20%, right. Okay, blame phase space for the rest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K