What is the justification for the branching ratios of tau lepton decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lepton Ratios
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the branching ratios of tau lepton decay, specifically the proportions of decay into hadrons, muons, and electrons. Participants are exploring the justification for these rates using concepts from particle physics, particularly the decay of W bosons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to relate the branching ratios to the decay mechanisms of W bosons, considering the contributions from different quark combinations and the role of the CKM matrix. There are discussions about the importance of density of states in the lepton decay channels and how this might affect the branching ratios.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants revising their calculations and questioning the assumptions made in their approaches. Some have suggested that the inclusion of certain particles, like charm-containing mesons, may not be appropriate, while others are exploring the implications of quark colors and phase space on the branching ratios.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the complexity of the decay processes and the impact of various factors, such as hadronization and the specific contributions of different decay channels. There is a recognition of the discrepancies in their calculations and a focus on refining their understanding of the underlying physics.

Fek
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Branching ratios of tau lepton decay:
hadrons 66%
muon 17%
electron 17%

Use your knowledge of the decay of W bosons to justify these rates.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The W+ boson can decay to any combination of quarks with +1 charge, but the CKM matrix suppresses many of these heavily, so let's just consider ud, us, cd, cs (where d/s are anti).

BR (electron) = g^2(w) / (3*((2g^2(w) cos^2x + 2g^2(w)sin^2x) + 2g^2(w)
= 1( 6 + 2) = 1/8

where g^2(w) cos^2x is the matrix element squared for ud and and cs
g^2(w)sin^2x is the matrix element squared for us and cd
g^2(w) is the matrix element squared for any lepton.

This doesn't give the right answer. Furthermore shouldn't density of states be very important given the fact that the lepton channel is 3 body, and in real life the tau decays into 3 or 4 particles most commonly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fek said:
so let's just consider ud, us, cd, cs (where d/s are anti).
You ignored tb for a good reason. There is something else you should ignore for the same reason.

Fek said:
This doesn't give the right answer. Furthermore shouldn't density of states be very important given the fact that the lepton channel is 3 body, and in real life the tau decays into 3 or 4 particles most commonly?
That is a smaller effect from hadronization.
 
I'm afraid I just can't see it. I'v
mfb said:
You ignored tb for a good reason. There is something else you should ignore for the same reason.

Many thanks for your reply. I can see I shouldn't have include the charm containing mesons as they are slightly to heavy. This brings the branching ratios to 50% hadrons and 25% for each lepton. Have I missed something else or is the remaining discrepancy justified by a density of states argument? Many thanks.
 
Fek said:
This brings the branching ratios to 50% hadrons and 25% for each lepton.
What happened to the quark colors now? The previous calculation seemed to have those.
 
Sorry made a silly mistake. So the BR should be 60% for hadrons and 20% for the electron
mfb said:
What happened to the quark colors now? The previous calculation seemed to have those.

Sorry made a silly mistake. BR should now be 60% for hadrons (3 * cos^2(x) + sin^2(x)) / (3 * (cos^2(x) + sin^2(x)) + 1 + 1 ) , and 20% for each lepton. Many thanks.
 
Right, and that is close to the actual values. You can get an even better approximation if you take kaons into account (with up, not with charm).
 
Have I not taken into account Kaons with the Cabibo factors (cos(x)) for non mixed states, and sin(x) for mixed states?
 
Well, I don't understand your numerator. Why is there no 3 for the sin term?
But sin and cos together should work, and give 20%, right. Okay, blame phase space for the rest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K