What Is the Laboratory Frame Energy of a Proton?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cartonn30gel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the laboratory frame energy of an ultra-relativistic proton interacting with a photon. The photon has an energy of 35 eV in the laboratory frame and 5 MeV in the proton's frame. The relativistic Doppler effect is applied to determine the frequency shift, leading to the conclusion that the proton is moving at a speed very close to the speed of light (c). The analysis confirms that the energy of the proton approaches infinity as its speed nears c, highlighting the impossibility of massive objects reaching light speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic energy equations
  • Familiarity with the relativistic Doppler effect
  • Knowledge of Lorentz velocity transformations
  • Basic concepts of photon energy calculations using Planck's equation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the relativistic Doppler effect on energy calculations
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore the concept of relativistic mass and its effects on energy
  • Investigate the limits of speed for massive particles in special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in the principles of special relativity and energy transformations in high-speed interactions.

cartonn30gel
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
how fast is that proton??

SORRY; I HAD TO MOVE THIS TO THE ADVANCED SECTION

Homework Statement



We are in a laboratory and there is a photon and an ultra-relativistic proton moving. The energy of the photon in the frame of reference of the laboratory is 35eV. The energy of the same photon in the frame of reference of the proton is 5MeV. What is the energy of the proton in the frame of reference of the laboratory?

Homework Equations



energy = h*f
Relativistic doppler effect
Lorenz velocity transformations
relativistic energy

The Attempt at a Solution



using energy = h*f

first frequency (f1) is 8.48*10^(15) Hz
second frequency (f2) is 1.21*10^(21) Hz

change of frequency is I guess because of Doppler effect
because f2 > f1, the proton and the photon must be approaching each other. But no matter what, the proton will see the photon approaching with a speed of c. I am not sure if it is valid to use the Doppler formula here. If I use, I get,
B=v/c=0,99999 (the relative speed of the photon and the proton)

then using Lorenz velocity transformation in x direction I get the speed of the proton to be -c. I thought this could be an indication of the proton's actually to be moving away from the photon (that means both moving in the same direction)

But then I cannot use Energy= (gama)*m*c^(2) because (gama) will be infinite.

I'd appreciate any help.
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you're right to use the doppler effect, but I didn't follow your application

The relativistic doppler shift is frequency observed = sqrt[(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)]*frequency emitted from the source

The problem is V is going to be humongous and yes, negative

f2/f1 is like somethingx10^35, so you get (10^35-1)=-(10^35+1)v/c

Divide both sides by 10^35+1 and you get -v/c=a number just so very much almost 1 but just not quite, like .9999 out to 30+ decimal places

Now when you use the equation like I did, you're assuming positive V means they're moving AWAY from each other, so the negative means the opposite of what you concluded, they're rushing towards each other, and the proton is basically going an incredibly small amount less than c. So yes gamma is going to be gigantic to the point of ludicrous and the energy of the proton is going to be gigantic to the point of unreasonable. But I think that's the idea

If it were ACTUALLY going the speed of light, which you rounded off too, then yes it would have infinite energy.

Which is the point, objects with mass don't get to go the speed of light because we can't impart infinite energy to them. So I think you did the problem right, me following or not, but reached the wrong conclusion
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K