What is the largest possible Rotating wheel space station?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The largest possible rotating wheel space station that can be constructed with current materials is fundamentally limited by the tensile strength of the materials used, rather than compressive strength. The maximum radius for such a structure is approximately double the breaking length of the material, as detailed in the concept of specific strength. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding both live load and dead load in the design, particularly how centrifugal effects impact the structural integrity of tension spokes. Additionally, the comparison between cart wheels and bicycle wheels illustrates the efficiency of material usage in structural design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile and compressive strength in materials
  • Familiarity with specific strength concepts
  • Knowledge of centrifugal force effects on structures
  • Basic principles of structural engineering and load analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific strength of materials used in aerospace engineering
  • Explore the design principles of rotating space habitats
  • Learn about the mechanics of centrifugal force in structural applications
  • Investigate the feasibility of cylindrical space elevators and their design challenges
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, structural engineers, space habitat designers, and anyone interested in advanced space station concepts and structural integrity analysis.

jms4
Messages
37
Reaction score
2
What is the largest possible Rotating wheel space station possible to be constructed with current materials? and what would be the population it would support. also formulas used for calculation.would be useful.
Could constructing cylindrical space elevators support more population,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DrStupid said:
The maximum radius is around double the breaking length. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_strength for some values.
Why? From that wiki article, this measures a material's ability to hold itself up, which is compressive strength. Why would this be relevant? I would think the limiting factor would be tensile strength. When you spin a ring, the ring wants to rip itself apart, not collapse together.
 
Read the wiki again... It includes tensile strength.
What you also have is a measure of 'live load' and 'dead load'. How long and strong can you make tension spokes before they fail under their own 'weight' due centrifugal effects so can carry no rim loads...

Why this way around ? Think cart wheel vs bicycle wheel, and how much less structural material the latter needs...
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner
newjerseyrunner said:
From that wiki article, this measures a material's ability to hold itself up

"...when supported only at the top."

The factor two results from the linear increase of the centrifugal force with the radius (instead of standard gravity). As Wiki also tells you, the breaking length applies to a fixed cross-section. That means that the maximum radius (or payload) can be increased by increasing the cross section of the spokes towards the center. But this is limited for geometrical resons.
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
586