What is the latest discovery in tetraquarks by LHCb?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the latest discoveries of tetraquarks and pentaquarks by the LHCb experiment, particularly focusing on the characteristics and implications of the recently discovered tetraquark ##T_{cc}^+##. Participants explore the nature of these exotic particles, their decay modes, and the theoretical frameworks surrounding them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that tetraquarks consist of two quarks and two antiquarks, with a focus on those containing at least one heavy quark for experimental confirmation.
  • It is mentioned that LHCb has discovered tetraquarks with charm quarks, including the recently announced ##T_{cc}^+##, which consists of two charm quarks, an anti-up, and an anti-down quark.
  • Participants discuss the potential for tetraquarks to be described as molecules made from mesons, particularly in the case of ##T_{cc}^+##, which can decay into two D0 mesons and a pion.
  • There is speculation about the existence of a predicted tetraquark ##T_{bb}## with bottom quarks, which is expected to have unique decay properties due to its binding energy.
  • Some participants express uncertainty regarding the existence of light tetraquarks and pentaquarks, suggesting that their short lifetimes may hinder detection.
  • There is a discussion about the classification of certain states, such as protonium and deuterium, and whether they should be considered hexaquarks or simply bound states of nucleons.
  • Concerns are raised about the terminology used to describe bound systems of hadrons, with suggestions that "mesonucleus" may be a more accurate term than "mesonic molecule."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the classification and properties of tetraquarks, pentaquarks, and hexaquarks. There is no consensus on the existence of light tetraquarks and pentaquarks, and the discussion remains unresolved on several points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the current understanding of light tetraquarks and pentaquarks, noting the challenges in distinguishing between various resonances and the potential for misclassification due to poorly measured states.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers and students in particle physics, particularly those focused on exotic hadrons and the implications of recent discoveries in quantum chromodynamics.

Messages
37,407
Reaction score
14,247
TL;DR
LHCb discovered ##T_{cc}^+##, with two charm quarks and two light antiquarks
LHCb has discovered a couple of tetraquarks and pentaquarks in the last years. Recently they added one more, but this one different from the previous discoveries.

Tetraquarks have two quarks and two antiquarks. If all of them are light (up/down/strange) it's basically impossible to measure them and experimentally confirm that they actually have four quarks, so people mainly focus on tetraquarks with at least one heavy quark. LHCb has found two with one charm quark, but most of them have a charm quark and an anti-charm quark (all other quarks are light in each case). Charm and anticharm are produced together by the strong interaction anyway, so it's a likely combination. One discovered tetraquark consists of two charm quarks and two anti-charm quarks.
Last month LHCb has announced the discovery of ##T_{cc}^+##, which has two charm quarks, an anti-up and an anti-down quark (and its antiparticle, which is always included here). It's the most charming tetraquark ever!

With two heavy quarks of the same type it is relatively easy to describe for theorists. The two charm quarks almost behave like classical particles in this system, and the light quarks don't change that much. Unlike for other exotic particles there were useful predictions for its mass, and the comparison with the measured mass helps refining the models. The ##T_{cc}^+## can decay to two D0 mesons and a pion and its mass is only a little bit above their combined mass. That puts it close to the sum of masses of ##D^{*+}+D^0##, so theorists study if the particle can be described as a molecule made out of these two mesons. It's a common pattern that tetraquarks can often be found close to the sum of masses of two mesons and pentaquarks near the sum of masses of baryon and meson. If the molecules are a good description then we are seeing some sort of "nuclear chemistry" at work.

Similar to ##T_{cc}^+##, there should be ##T_{bb}## with two bottom quarks instead of charm quarks. It is predicted to be bound quite tightly and with an energy too low to decay via the strong interaction. It would have to decay via the weak interaction, which means it should be long-living and fly maybe a few millimeters before decaying. That would give unprecedented insight into the properties of tetraquarks - you can find all associated particles, you can look for many more decay modes and so on. Unfortunately bottom quarks are rare compared to charm, and you need two of them.

LHCb announcement
Detailed article by Tommaso Dorigo
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Lord Crc, dlgoff, fresh_42 and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you summarize known polyquarks?
There is one known and stable light hexaquark, that behaves plainly as a nucleus consisting of two separate nucleons. Deuteron also is longer lived than one of the component nucleons.
Protonium also possibly counts as a hexaquark. Is protonium bound by electromagnetic or strong forces?

Now, there don´t seem to be any light pentaquarks. Interactions between nucleons and pions do not seem to form bound nuclei. Neither do there appear to be any light tetraquarks - interaction between two pions does not seem to form bound nuclei either.

Which heavy tetraquarks, pentaquarks and hexaquarks are confirmed to exist?
 
Protonium has a binding energy of less than 1 keV, so it's two well-separated hadrons. Deuterium can be described nicely as bound state of proton and neutron. In a true hexaquark the quark content should be more important.
snorkack said:
Now, there don´t seem to be any light pentaquarks.
Or we just can't find them. They are probably very short-living, and even if you find any resonance, how do you distinguish some wide ##uddd\bar{u}## resonance from a wide ##udd# resonance? There are tons of poorly measured light quark resonances. Same for tetraquarks.
snorkack said:
Which heavy tetraquarks, pentaquarks and hexaquarks are confirmed to exist?
Patrick Koppenburg maintains a list of all discovered particles at the LHC. It doesn't include the X(3872) because that was discovered by Belle before. I think everything else is included.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
mfb said:
Protonium has a binding energy of less than 1 keV, so it's two well-separated hadrons. Deuterium can be described nicely as bound state of proton and neutron. In a true hexaquark the quark content should be more important.Or we just can't find them. They are probably very short-living, and even if you find any resonance, how do you distinguish some wide ##uddd\bar{u}## resonance from a wide ##udd# resonance? There are tons of poorly measured light quark resonances. Same for tetraquarks.
And they are just that - resonances. While the one confirmed light hexaquark is stable.
Yes, light diquarks decay - all three of them - but even π0 has just 8 eV width.
The two non-resonance light baryons form one hexaquark and the other two combinations (diproton and dineutron) are well known to be unbound, with decay/scattering widths in MeV range.
How about the three light mesons? How well are pion-nucleon and pion-pion scattering processes known?
I suspect that absence of light tetraquark and pentaquark states with width in the order of shorter lived component lifetime or more can be well verified.

Also, I should think the expression "mesonic molecule" misleading. Mesons, like nucleons and hyperons, are hadrons and subject to strong force. Just like a bound system of two or more baryons, some or all of which are hyperons, is a "hypernucleus", not a "hyperonic molecule", a bound system of two or more hadrons, some or all of which are mesons, could well be described as "mesonucleus".
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K