What is the Length of a Compound Microscope?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The length of a compound microscope can refer to two specific measurements: the tube length (L), which is the distance between the focal points of the objective lens and the eyepiece lens, and the distance (d) between the objective and eyepiece lenses. There is no universally accepted definition for "length" in this context, as it can vary based on the microscope's design and focusing adjustments. The discussion emphasizes the importance of precise terminology and context when referring to these measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical principles related to lenses
  • Familiarity with compound microscope components
  • Knowledge of ray diagrams in optics
  • Basic concepts of focusing mechanisms in microscopes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between tube length and overall length in microscopes
  • Explore the significance of focal points in optical systems
  • Learn about ray diagrams and their applications in microscopy
  • Investigate how focusing adjustments affect optical measurements
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in the fields of optics, microscopy, and biology who seek to deepen their understanding of microscope measurements and terminology.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
TL;DR
Compound microscope uses two convex lenses, one as objective lens and one as eye piece lens. What is the length of compound microscope?
If we say "length of microscope", which distance does it refer to? Is it:

a) the tube length (L), which is the distance between the focal point of objective and focal point of eye piece lens
1612231160533.png


OR

b) the distance (d) between objective and eye piece lens

1612231194874.png

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
songoku said:
Summary:: Compound microscope uses two convex lenses, one as objective lens and one as eye piece lens. What is the length of compound microscope?

If we say "length of microscope", which distance does it refer to?
I think there is no accepted answer. The dimension that's marked on the ray diagram would be the length to consider if there is some discussion that refers to it(?). One important 'length' would be the length of the cutout in the carrying case, which would be longer than the distance between the centres of the lenses and shorter than the distance between object and eye.
Not something to worry about too much, perhaps and not part of the theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
sophiecentaur said:
I think there is no accepted answer. The dimension that's marked on the ray diagram would be the length to consider if there is some discussion that refers to it(?).
There is no specific discussion that refers to it. My teacher said length of microscope is distance between two lenses and I came across the term tube length while googling about microscope so I am confused which one is the length of microscope

One important 'length' would be the length of the cutout in the carrying case, which would be longer than the distance between the centres of the lenses and shorter than the distance between object and eye.
Not something to worry about too much, perhaps and not part of the theory.
What do you mean by length of cutout?

Thanks
 
Most optical stuff lays in a cutout hole in the carry case to stop it moving about. The width and depth of the hole are also relevant but not to the optics.
I do not think there’s an official term “length”. That can change as the focusing is adjusted .
Edit: You have already said that your teacher gave you a definition for the purpose of the lesson. Tube length will depend on all sorts of things and is of no 'optical' significance. You should stop worrying about using the correct word and concentrate on using and demanding precise descriptions to suit the context. Classifying can be a real waste of time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
sophiecentaur said:
Most optical stuff lays in a cutout hole in the carry case to stop it moving about. The width and depth of the hole are also relevant but not to the optics.
I do not think there’s an official term “length”. That can change as the focusing is adjusted .
Edit: You have already said that your teacher gave you a definition for the purpose of the lesson. Tube length will depend on all sorts of things and is of no 'optical' significance. You should stop worrying about using the correct word and concentrate on using and demanding precise descriptions to suit the context. Classifying can be a real waste of time.
Thank you very much sophiecentaur
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K