What is the Limit Definition for Proving a Function Approaches 0?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit definition for proving a function approaches 0 is established through the epsilon-delta method. For any number a, where 0 < a < 1, the function f approaches 0 at a by demonstrating that for any ε > 0, there exists a natural number n such that 1/n ≤ ε. The proof shows that the only potential exceptions to |f(x) - 0| < ε are finitely many rational numbers, allowing the selection of a delta (δ) that ensures |f(x) - 0| remains less than ε for all x within δ of a, except possibly at a itself. This method effectively confirms the limit behavior of the function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of epsilon-delta definitions in calculus
  • Familiarity with rational numbers and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of limits and continuity in functions
  • Experience with LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Learn how to apply the epsilon-delta method to different functions
  • Explore the concept of continuity and its relationship with limits
  • Practice using LaTeX for clear mathematical communication
USEFUL FOR

First-year calculus students, educators teaching limit concepts, and anyone seeking to strengthen their understanding of mathematical proofs involving limits.

freshlikeuhh
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm a first-year calculus student and I'm fairly behind with my work. The transition is tough and when i read my textbook, I don't fully absorb everything. I thought I would post an example problem whose solution I do not follow completely, since it is fairly important in the scope of things.

I have provided a diagram for this problem and the solution provided by the author. If anyone would be able to explain to me in simpler terms how the conclusion was reached, I would greatly appreciate it.

EDIT: I have previewed my post and found some very weird issues when trying to use LaTeX, so I have removed the [tex [/tex] brackets, since everything displayed very improperly. I am not very experienced with LaTeX, so there may be something I am doing wrong, so if anyone could point that out, I will gladly fix up the presentation of my post.

But here is the problem:

http://i.imgur.com/nDyAv.jpg

For any number a, with 0 < a < 1, the function f approaches 0 at a. To prove this, consider any number \epsilon > 0. Let n be a natural number so large that \frac{1}{n} \leq \epsilon. Notice that the only numbers x for which |f(x) = 0| < \epsilon could be false are

\frac{1}{2}; \frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{3}; \frac{1}{4}, \frac{3}{4}...; \frac{1}{n},...,\frac{n-1}{n}

(If a is rational, then a might be one of these numbers.) However many of these numbers there may be, there are, at any rate, only finitely many. Therefore, of all these numbers, one is closest to a; that is, |p/q - a| is smallest for one p/q among these numbers. (If a happens to be one of these numbers, then consider only the values |p/q - a| for p/q \neq a. This closest distance may be chosen as the \delta. For if 0 < |x-a| < \delta, then x is not one of

\frac{1}{2},...,\frac{n-1}{n} and therefore |f(x)-0| < \epsilon. This completes the proof. Note that our description of the delta which works for a given epsilon is completely adequate - there is no reason why we must give a formula for delta in terms of epsilon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
freshlikeuhh said:
For any number a, with 0 < a < 1, the function f approaches 0 at a. To prove this, consider any number [tex]\epsilon > 0[/tex]. Let n be a natural number so large that

[tex]\frac{1}{n} \leq \epsilon[/tex].

Notice that the only numbers x for which [tex]|f(x) = 0| < \epsilon[/tex] could be false are

[tex]\frac{1}{2}; \frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{3}; \frac{1}{4}, \frac{3}{4}...; \frac{1}{n},...,\frac{n-1}{n}[/tex]

(If a is rational, then a might be one of these numbers.) However many of these numbers there may be, there are, at any rate, only finitely many. Therefore, of all these numbers, one is closest to a; that is, |p/q - a| is smallest for one p/q among these numbers. (If a happens to be one of these numbers, then consider only the values |p/q - a| for [tex]p/q \neq a[/tex]. This closest distance may be chosen as the [tex]\delta[/tex]. For if [tex]0 < |x-a| < \delta[/tex], then x is not one of

[tex]\frac{1}{2},...,\frac{n-1}{n}[/tex] and therefore [tex]|f(x)-0| < \epsilon[/tex].

This completes the proof. Note that our description of the delta which works for a given epsilon is completely adequate - there is no reason why we must give a formula for delta in terms of epsilon.

The basic idea is that you choose delta so that there is no fraction with denominator less than n within delta of a. You can then say that within delta of a, f is smaller than 1/n, except possibly at a itself.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K