What is the line integral of a curve?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of a line integral, specifically I = -abc, derived from the integral of the function over specified limits. Participants debate the necessity of the negative sign in the final answer, with some suggesting that it should be stripped to match a potential answer choice. The concept of conservative forces and potential functions is introduced, emphasizing that the integral's value depends on endpoints rather than absolute values. Ultimately, there is consensus that the correct value of the integral is I = -abc, and the notion of equating this to its absolute value is rejected as incorrect. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the results of mathematical calculations.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-28_0-5-32.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Line integral of a curve

## I = \int_{ }^{ } yz dx + \int_{ }^{ } zx dy + \int_{ }^{ } xy dz ## with proper limits.

## I = \int_{\frac { \pi }4}^{ \frac { 3 \pi} 4} abc ( \cos^2 t - \sin^2 t ) dt = -abc ##

|I| = abc

So, the answer is option (a).

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-28_0-5-32.png
    upload_2017-12-28_0-5-32.png
    9.3 KB · Views: 1,073
Physics news on Phys.org
Except for the negative sign the answer correct. You just can't strip the negative sign because it doesn't match one of the choices. What if ##-abc## were a sixth choice? A better way to do this would be to see if ##\vec{F}## can be derived from some scalar function U, such that ##\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla}U## (Hint: It can). Think of ##\vec{F}## as a conservative force and ##U## as the potential from which it is derived. Then the integral depends on the end points, i.e. ##I=U(t_2)-U(t_1)##.
 
kuruman said:
You just can't strip the negative sign because it doesn't match one of the choices. What if −abc were a sixth choice?
I had the impression that value of I = |I| (which is wrong according to your above comment). So, I removed the negative sign.

I did the calculation again and I got -abc.
## I = \int_{\frac { \pi }4}^{ \frac { 3 \pi} 4} abc ( \cos^2 t - \sin^2 t ) dt =##
## \frac { \sin{(2t)}} 2 |_ {\frac { \pi }4} ^{ \frac { 3 \pi} 4} abc = -abc ##I do not see what is wrong in the above calculation.

Taking ## \vec F = - \nabla U ##

I have to calculate ## U = - \int \vec F \cdot d \vec x ## ## = -abc = \frac { \sin{ (2t)}} 2##Then, I have to calculate ## \int \vec F \cdot d \vec x ## for t going from ## \frac { \pi} 4 ~ to ~ \frac { 3 \pi }4 ## .

This gives ## U(\frac { \pi} 4) – U(\frac {3 \pi} 4) ## , which is again –abc.

I am not getting what mistake I am doing here, but I am coming towards the same answer.
 
Pushoam said:
I had the impression that value of I = |I| (which is wrong according to your above comment). So, I removed the negative sign.

I did the calculation again and I got -abc.
## I = \int_{\frac { \pi }4}^{ \frac { 3 \pi} 4} abc ( \cos^2 t - \sin^2 t ) dt =##
## \frac { \sin{(2t)}} 2 |_ {\frac { \pi }4} ^{ \frac { 3 \pi} 4} abc = -abc ##
This is what I get, as well. It's not unheard of for posted answers to have typos.
Pushoam said:
I do not see what is wrong in the above calculation.

Taking ## \vec F = - \nabla U ##
The line integral calculation should be pretty straightforward. I don't see why you would need to do this.
Pushoam said:
I have to calculate ## U = - \int \vec F \cdot d \vec x ## ## = -abc = \frac { \sin{ (2t)}} 2##Then, I have to calculate ## \int \vec F \cdot d \vec x ## for t going from ## \frac { \pi} 4 ~ to ~ \frac { 3 \pi }4 ## .

This gives ## U(\frac { \pi} 4) – U(\frac {3 \pi} 4) ## , which is again –abc.
Pushoam said:
I am not getting what mistake I am doing here, but I am coming towards the same answer.
 
Mark44 said:
This is what I get, as well. It's not unheard of for posted answers to have typos.
I also get this answer after discovering an excess of a negative sign.
 
kuruman said:
I also get this answer after discovering an excess of a negative sign.
So I'm thinking that there's a typo in the answer.
 
So, I = -abc
And value of I = |I| = abc
Is this correct?
 
Mark44 said:
So I'm thinking that there's a typo in the answer.
I think so too. I did it two ways, using OP's method and using the scalar function but introduced an extraneous negative sign in the latter which got me going for a short while.
Pushoam said:
And value of I = |I| = abc
Is this correct?
The value of the integral is I = - abc as we all agree by now. Why do you feel you should take the absolute value?
 
Pushoam said:
So, I = -abc
And value of I = |I| = abc
Is this correct?
I agree that I = -abc, but ##I \ne |I|##. You can't just arbitrarily take the absolute value.
 
  • #10
kuruman said:
Why do you feel you should take the absolute value?
I would say to force the computed answer to agree with the posted answer. This is not a good reason to do so.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
  • #11
Actually, I am having problem with the word " value".
I thought value of I = |I|...(1)
But,(1) is wrong.
value of I = the integral which I get after the calculation
absolute value of I = |I|
 
  • #12
Values can be positive or negative. Absolute values are positive only. The question does not specify "absolute".
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
  • #13
Pushoam said:
Actually, I am having problem with the word " value".
I thought value of I = |I|...(1)
No. The value of I is whatever it is -- positive, negative, or zero. I = |I| if and only if I >= 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K