What is the Magnetic Field of a Bent Wire at the Focus?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic flux density (B) at the focus of a parabolic wire carrying a current I. Participants clarify that the Biot-Savart law is applicable, specifically using the differential form dB = (μ0/4π) d l x r / r³. The focus is determined to be at the coordinates (0, 0.25), derived from the parabolic equation y = x²/4p, where p is the distance from the vertex to the focus. The integration of the Biot-Savart expression is suggested to be conducted from x = -∞ to +∞, with considerations for the geometry of the parabola.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Biot-Savart law for magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with parabolic equations and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of vector calculus
  • Ability to perform integration in Cartesian coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Biot-Savart law in different geometries
  • Learn about the properties of parabolas and their focal points
  • Explore vector calculus techniques for magnetic field calculations
  • Practice integration techniques for functions defined in Cartesian coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and magnetic field analysis around current-carrying conductors.

Octavius1287
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An infinite wire of parabolic shape carries a current I, find the magnetic flux density B, at the focus


Homework Equations


B=(μ0*I)\(2∏r) I know this is for a straight wire, I'm not sure what i would use for a U shaped wire

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I figure the current is running for one end to the other and the B field around the wire but I don't know what at the focus means, and I'm not sure what the bent U shape/parabolic effects the B field
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, draw a parabola y = x2 and draw the d l and r vectors at some point up the parabola on both sides. The focus in this case is at (0, 0.25).

Express the d l and r vectors in Cartesian terms. Wind up with everything in terms of x, with no y terms. Then integrate the Biot-Savart expression for dB from x =-∞ to +∞.

I must say the math looks awful. Perhaps someone else has a better approach.
 
oh great
 
Awful, not impossible! In fact, looking at it again, may not be bad at all.

First, notice that you only need to address the parabola for x >= 0, then multiply by 2.

You know you need dl and r going from a point on the parabola (x,y). You also have y = x2.

dl = dx i + dy j and points upwards & to the right (assume current flows in the +y direction).
r= -x i + (0.25 - y) j and points from a point (x,y) on the parabola to the focus.

That should get you going.
 
alright cool thank you
 
why is the focus at 0, 0.25? and would i use this? even though it for a closed curve?
7463d12e92a79b39f6b3ac7d44dfe1be.png
 
or this http://pms.iitk.ernet.in/wiki/images/math/5/c/8/5c8f0ff0e0d4749758d0abaf2faa2af2.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Octavius1287 said:
why is the focus at 0, 0.25? and would i use this? even though it for a closed curve?
7463d12e92a79b39f6b3ac7d44dfe1be.png

You have the right formula, aka the Biot-Savart law.

The expression for a parabola with vertex at the origin and open end upward (along the y axis) is
y = x2/4p
where p = distance along y from the vertex to the focus. So if you choose y = x2 then p = 1/4.

You can choose p to be any positive real number you want. The problem did not specify p so presumably it makes no difference to the solution.

BTW the "C' by the integral sign does not belong. This is not a contour integration. You are integrating d B to get B at one point.
 
Last edited:
Octavius1287 said:
or this http://pms.iitk.ernet.in/wiki/images/math/5/c/8/5c8f0ff0e0d4749758d0abaf2faa2af2.png

EDIT:

This is the differential form of Biot-Savart. The " k " indicates that B wound up in the +z direction, just as it will in your case. θ is the angle between d l and r.

However, I earlier suggested vector forms for d l and r and I suggest you ignore this formula and retain the vector format for dB which is

d B = (μ0/4π)d l x r / r3.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
i guess ,y last question would be, how did you figure the
dl = dx i + dy j
r= -x i + (0.25 - y) j
 
  • #11
the first is just pythagoras: you have a vector dl with x component dx and y component dy. keep in mind dl is a differential stretch along the parabola.

The second is derived by the usual formula for a vector going from (x1,y1) to (x2,y2). (The direction is important).
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K