What is the magnitude of charge on each sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AznBoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnitude of charge on two small metallic spheres suspended as pendulums. The spheres, each with a mass of 0.2g, reach equilibrium at a 5-degree angle when given the same electric charge. Participants analyze the forces acting on the spheres, including gravitational and electric forces, and the tension in the strings. A key point of confusion is the application of Coulomb's law, where the product of the charges (q²) must be used instead of their sum (2q). Ultimately, understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly solving the problem and arriving at the correct charge value of 7.2 nC.
AznBoi
Messages
470
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two small metallic spheres, each of mass 0.2g are suspendedas pednulums by light strings from a common point. The spheres are given the same eletric charge, and it is found that they come to equilibrim when each stringis at an angle of 5degrees with the vertical. If each string is 30 cm long, what is the magnitude of the charge on each sphere?


Homework Equations


F=kq1q2/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured I would need the distance between the spheres so I used x=.3m sin5 deg and multiplied x by 2 to get the distance (r) between them.

Do I add two force equations and put them equal to zero? What other equations do I need? If I try solving for q that way everything cancels out. :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so you have the distance, and you want the charge, so you need the force repelling these spheres.
Code:
 /\           y
O  O          |_x
Just consider one of these balls. You know that the electric force is keeping them apart, but there must be a force stopping them from flying apart in the x direction. Gravity points downwards (y direction), so it's not that.

The only other thing it could be is the string. The string's force (tension) can be broken up into components. One of these must be equal and opposite to gravity, and the other must be equal and opposite to the EM force, otherwise the spheres would not be stationary.

You know the gravitational force, so you know one of the components of the string. You can then find the other component of the string, which should give you what you need.

Hope this helps.
 
Hmm, I kind of get what you are saying. So I need to make the x component of the tension force equal to the outward eletric force?

I think I will be able to find tension because that's what the mass is for! I'll try it out, thanks! :smile:
 
I still didn't manage to get the correct answer.

Here's my work:

I found the (r) distance between the two metal spheres first.
sin5deg= \frac {5}{.03m}
2x=r=.0523m

I drew a FBD with <--- as F_e , ----> as T_x , Up vector as T_y and Down vector as the weight.

T_y=W=mg=(2*10^-4kg)(9.8)= 0.00196 N

Used sine/cosine to find T_x and got: T_x=1.7147*10^-4 N

Tx-F_e=0 so Tx=F_e

Here is where I think I've messed up but I'm not sure:

T_x=k_e\frac{2q}{r^2}

q=\frac{T_x*r^2}{2K_e}

and I solved for q and I got 2.6 x 10^-17

The correct answer is 7.2 nC. What am I doing wrong? Thanks!
 
It looks pretty at first glance, up until you get to 2Q, think that should be
q^2
 
denverdoc said:
It looks pretty at first glance, up until you get to 2Q, think that should be
q^2

ooh. but I thought 2q and q^2 are the same? I'll try it anyways, thanks! :smile:
 
AznBoi said:
ooh. but I thought 2q and q^2 are the same? I'll try it anyways, thanks! :smile:

Er, no.

q+q = 2q
q*q = q2
 
Woww! It works! Can you explain to me why I can't use 2q instead of q^2.

Edit: oh ok. xP I'll try to not make a mistake like that anymore.Thanks you guys! =D
 
AznBoi said:
Woww! It works! Can you explain to me why I can't use 2q instead of q^2.

Because coulomb's law needs the product of the two charges and not the sum.
k \frac{q1 \cdot q1}{r^2} \not= k \frac{q1+q1}{r^2}
q \cdot q \not = q+q<br />

When we have several of the same numbers, x, being multiplied together. It is more efficient to do xn, where n is the number of x's we have.
If we have several of the same numbers, x, being added together. It is more efficient to do n*x, where n is the number of x's being added.
 
  • #10
ranger said:
Because coulomb's law needs the product of the two charges and not the sum.
k \frac{q1 \cdot q1}{r^2} \not= k \frac{q1+q1}{r^2}
q \cdot q \not = q+q<br />

When we have several of the same numbers, x, being multiplied together. It is more efficient to do xn, where n is the number of x's we have.
If we have several of the same numbers, x, being added together. It is more efficient to do n*x, where n is the number of x's being added.

Thanks for the awsome explanation! :smile: I completely get it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
4K