What is the Maximum Inscribed Sphere for Ellipsoid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haftred
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipsoid Sphere
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the largest sphere that can be inscribed within an ellipsoid defined by the equation 3x^2 + 2y^2 + z^2 = 6. The problem involves concepts from multivariable calculus, particularly the method of Lagrange multipliers.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to maximize the function x^2 + y^2 + z^2 under the constraint of the ellipsoid equation but struggles with the application of Lagrange multipliers. Some participants suggest exploring the geometric interpretation of the ellipsoid and its principal axes as an alternative approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to approach the problem, with some focusing on Lagrange multipliers while others suggest a more geometric perspective. There is recognition of the challenges in applying the method correctly, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted requirement to use Lagrange multipliers as part of the homework constraints, which influences the direction of the discussion. Participants are also questioning the assumptions related to the extrema of the function and the implications of the solutions derived from the equations.

Haftred
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find the largest sphere that be inscribed inside the ellipsoid with equation 3x^2 + 2y^2 + z^2 = 6.



Homework Equations



I know I will need at least 2 equations. One of them is the constraining equation (f(x) = a, where 'a' is a constant) and the other is the equation you want to maximize. I need to use Lagrange multipliers to find a lambda such that (del) F = lambda (del G).



The Attempt at a Solution



My first attempt was to maximize the function x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = f(x,y,z) and use the constraining equation for the ellipsoid (3x^2 + 2y^2 + z^2 = 6). However, there is no lambda that will made del (F) = L (del [G]). I think I'm using the wrong equations. Another idea is to find the point(s) on the ellipsoid that lies closest to the origin and use that as the radius for my sphere. However, that boils down to the same equations I already unsuccesfully used.

Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do it by Lagrange multipliers if you really want to, but the easy way is to see what the equation of the ellipsoid means geometrically. What are its principal axes? What is the length of the shortest principal axis? Then you know enough to just write down the answer.
 
yeah, but the problem makes you use lagrange multipliers =(
 
Find the extrema of f(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2
subject to g(x,y,z) = 3x^2 + 2y^2 + z^2 - 6 = 0

The Lagrange equations are the components of the gradient of f(x) + L.g(x) = 0
2x + L.6x = 0 (1)
2y + L.4y = 0 (2)
2z + L.2z = 0 (3)
and 3x^2 + 2y^2 + z^2 = 6 (4)

(3) gives L = -1 or z = 0
if L = -1:
(1) and (2) give x = 0 and y = 0
(4) gives z^2 = 6 so the extreme radius = sqrt(6). But (by inspection) that's a maximum not a minumum.

If z = 0:
(1) and (2) both give L = 0
(4) gives 3x^2 + 2y^2 = 6

So I suppose you now have to find the extrema of x^2 + y^2 subject to 3x^2 + 2y^2 = 6. Obviously that will lead to the answer but I don't recall having this situation happen with Lagrange multipliers before.
 
Sorry, I couldn't see what was in front of my nose in the previous post till after I logged off the forum!

2x + L.6x = 0 (1)
2y + L.4y = 0 (2)
2z + L.2z = 0 (3)

There are THREE sets of solutions of those equations with L non equal to zero:

L = -1/3 y = 0 z = 0
L = -1/2 x = 0 z = 0
L = -1 x = 0 y = 0

And using (4) you get the three extreme values of the function, corresponding to the three principal axes of the ellipse.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K