What is the meaning of Wave function?

Click For Summary
The wave function is a complex number because it allows for a more comprehensive mathematical representation of quantum states, where real numbers alone would be insufficient. While using complex numbers in physics can be a mathematical convenience, in quantum mechanics, the complex nature of the wave function is essential for accurately describing phenomena such as interference and superposition. The real part of the wave function is typically extracted to relate to measurable physical quantities. This complexity is not merely a mathematical artifact; it plays a crucial role in the behavior of quantum systems. Understanding the wave function's complex nature is fundamental to grasping the principles of quantum mechanics.
Outrageous
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
Wave function is a complex number , why do we have to consider it as a complex number?
Quote:– but there is nothing in the wave equation that restricts them
to being real numbers. If we temporarily suspend disbelief that physical
quantities may be associated with complex amplitudes, then we may explore
what happens when these constants take complex or imaginary values.
from http://phyweb.phys.soton.ac.uk/quantum/lectures/waves4.pdf

is that mean no necessary to have wave function as a complex number?
I can understand why do we use complex number in the reactance of a capacitance because the impedance of a capacitance varies with the frequency.
Can you please teach me what is the meaning of the complex number in wave function ? anything change that make the intensity change??
Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For physical quantities that are real (e.g. displacement of a mass on a spring, electric field in an electromagnetic wave), using the complex form of a wave is purely a mathematical convenience. It's always understood that we have to take the real part of the complex form at the end of the calculation.

You can probably take any such calculation and start with e.g. ##\cos(\omega t)## instead of ##e^{i\omega t}## to represent an oscillating motion, but then you have to mess around a lot with trigonometric identities.

In quantum mechanics, the situation is different. There was recently a long discussion in the Quantum Physics forum about why the QM wave function is complex:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=683821
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
465
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K