What is the measurement of a Logarithmic

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bootsie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic Measurement
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of logarithmic measurements, specifically in relation to a claim about the sun being measured as 10^12 logarithmic. Participants explore the meaning of logarithmic scales, their applications, and the potential confusion surrounding the terminology used in a referenced book.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the phrase "10^12 logarithmic," suggesting it may not be a standard term and could reflect the author's unique definition.
  • One participant cites a definition from "Science Desk Reference," explaining that a logarithmic scale represents a 10-fold increase in size over divisions, spanning 40 orders of magnitude.
  • Another participant attempts to clarify that the sun being "10^12 logarithmic" could imply it is 12 times larger than a baseline measurement, although they acknowledge that the sun is much larger than that.
  • Some participants discuss the general properties of logarithms, noting that they do not typically have units and are useful for expressing large ranges of numbers.
  • There is a debate about the appropriate contexts for using logarithmic scales, with some arguing that they are best for very large ranges while others suggest they may not be suitable for smaller ranges.
  • One participant corrects another's grammatical misunderstanding, clarifying that "logarithmic" is an adjective modifying "scale," and explains how logarithmic scales function in graphing data.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding logarithmic measurements and their applications. There is no consensus on the specific meaning of "10^12 logarithmic," and multiple interpretations of logarithmic scales and their uses are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity in definitions and the potential for confusion in terminology. The discussion reflects a range of familiarity with logarithmic concepts, indicating varying levels of expertise among participants.

Bootsie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was reading a book and it said the sun was 10^12 Logarithmic. What is the measurement of a Logarithmic?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bootsie said:
I was reading a book and it said the sun was 10^12 Logarithmic. What is the measurement of a Logarithmic?


Put a link to that page in that book or try to quote it EXACTLY and/or read the definition. As far as I know, there's nothing like

"some number logarithmic" in general, though it could be that book's author's own definition of something.

DonAntonio
 
DonAntonio said:
Put a link to that page in that book or try to quote it EXACTLY and/or read the definition. As far as I know, there's nothing like

"some number logarithmic" in general, though it could be that book's author's own definition of something.

DonAntonio

I can't quite get it but here it is, "The following scale of the universe is logarithmic, meaning that each division represents a 10-fold increase in size over the one before. The scale ranges over 40 orders of magnitude or increments of powers of 10." This is from the book, "Science Desk Reference"
 
Bootsie said:
I can't quite get it but here it is, "The following scale of the universe is logarithmic, meaning that each division represents a 10-fold increase in size over the one before. The scale ranges over 40 orders of magnitude or increments of powers of 10." This is from the book, "Science Desk Reference"

Yes, that makes perfect sense (which your original post did not). Do you not understand logarithms / log scales?
 
phinds said:
Yes, that makes perfect sense (which your original post did not). Do you not understand logarithms / log scales?

I do not understand much of it only that it is the universal scale for very large or very small things.
 
Bootsie said:
I can't quite get it but here it is, "The following scale of the universe is logarithmic, meaning that each division represents a 10-fold increase in size over the one before. The scale ranges over 40 orders of magnitude or increments of powers of 10." This is from the book, "Science Desk Reference"



Oh, ok. So it seems to be the author uses a logarithmic scale to measure stuff. For example, using logarithms in

base 10, we can say that 1, 10, 100 are doubling logaritmic measures, and this means 0=\log_{10}1\,,\,1=\log_{10}10\,,\,2=\log_{10}100 Thus, to say the sun is 10^{12} logarithmic probably means, for that author, that the sun is 12 times bigger than

something with pre-agreed measure unit of 1 (say, the Earth), since \log_{10}10^{12}=12\,\log_{10}10=12.

Of course, the sun is way bigger than 12 times the Earth.

DonAntonio
 
Maybe this is important: do you know what a logarithm is??
 
Logarithms don't normally have units.
Sometimes when you are dealing with really large numbers, it is better to express them on a log scale. One log scale you may be familiar with is the Richter scale for earthquakes.
For example, an 8.0 earthquake has a seismic wave amplitude 100, which is 10^2, times greater than that of a 6.0 earthquake.

EDIT: As said below, it would be more accurate to say "when dealing with a large range of differences between numbers, it is best to use the log scale."
 
Last edited:
Bootsie said:
I do not understand much of it only that it is the universal scale for very large or very small things.

No, that is not quite correct. Logarithms are used where a number RANGE is very large. If you want to make a plot that goes from 100,000,000 to 100,000,010 you would not very likely use logs. BUT if you want to make a plot that goes from 0 to 100,000,000 then you MIGHT use logs, depending on the distribution of the data. You should study up on logs / log scales.
 
  • #10
Your original error, then, was grammatic. "Logarithmic" is not a noun, it is an adjective. In what you quote "logarithmic" modifies "scale". A logarithmic scale puts the data point (x, y) on the graph where, normally, (x, log(y)) would be. That is, the "y-axis" measures log(y), not y.

An advantage is that the (common) logarithm of 10^n is n and the logarithm of 10^{-n} is -n so that very large and very small amounts are changed to "workable" numbers.

Another is that graphs, (x, y), of exponential functions, such as y= c a^{bx} become graphs of y= log(c a^{bx})= b log(a)x+ log(c), a straight line with slope b log(a) and y-intercept log(c).

One disadvantage is that y must be positive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K