MHB What is the minimum value for x in this triangle with angle bisectors AD and BD?

AI Thread Summary
The minimum integer value for x in the triangle with angle bisectors AD and BD is determined to be 16. Attempts to reduce x to 15 lead to a scenario where the triangle ceases to exist, as the angles would sum to 180 degrees, making AC parallel to BC. The reasoning involves fixing points B and D while rotating line AD, which demonstrates that reducing x further results in a non-triangular configuration. Thus, the conclusion is that x cannot be less than 16. The discussion emphasizes the geometric implications of angle bisectors in determining the minimum value.
ketanco
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In the attached, what is the minimum integer value x can take?

AD and BD are angle bisectors

the answer is 16 - but i do not know how they did it

I am totally stuck, could not think of anything here. The angle bisector formula I know does not fit hereView attachment 8569
 

Attachments

  • 20181106_183308.jpg
    20181106_183308.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 91
Mathematics news on Phys.org
View attachment 8570

Here is an intuitive idea of what this question is about. It's up to you to express it mathematically!

Suppose we keep $B$ and $D$ fixed, and imagine what happens as we try to reduce $x$ by rotating the line $AD$ around $D$, as indicated in the diagram. As the angles at $A$ and $B$ increase, $C$ will be pushed further and further away from $D$.

If the obtuse angle $ADB$ is reduced to a right angle, then (by Pythagoras) $x$ will have been reduced to $15$. But in that case, the angles $DAB$ and $DBA$ will add up to $90^\circ$. So the angles $CAB$ and $CBA$ will add up to $180^\circ$. In other words, $AC$ will be parallel to $BC$ (or to put it another way $C$ will have gone off to infinity). In that case, $ABC$ will no longer be a triangle.

The conclusion from that is that $x$ cannot be reduced to $15$. So the smallest integer value that it can take must be $16$.
 

Attachments

  • triangle.jpg
    triangle.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 101
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top