MHB What is the minimum value for x in this triangle with angle bisectors AD and BD?

ketanco
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In the attached, what is the minimum integer value x can take?

AD and BD are angle bisectors

the answer is 16 - but i do not know how they did it

I am totally stuck, could not think of anything here. The angle bisector formula I know does not fit hereView attachment 8569
 

Attachments

  • 20181106_183308.jpg
    20181106_183308.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 89
Mathematics news on Phys.org
View attachment 8570

Here is an intuitive idea of what this question is about. It's up to you to express it mathematically!

Suppose we keep $B$ and $D$ fixed, and imagine what happens as we try to reduce $x$ by rotating the line $AD$ around $D$, as indicated in the diagram. As the angles at $A$ and $B$ increase, $C$ will be pushed further and further away from $D$.

If the obtuse angle $ADB$ is reduced to a right angle, then (by Pythagoras) $x$ will have been reduced to $15$. But in that case, the angles $DAB$ and $DBA$ will add up to $90^\circ$. So the angles $CAB$ and $CBA$ will add up to $180^\circ$. In other words, $AC$ will be parallel to $BC$ (or to put it another way $C$ will have gone off to infinity). In that case, $ABC$ will no longer be a triangle.

The conclusion from that is that $x$ cannot be reduced to $15$. So the smallest integer value that it can take must be $16$.
 

Attachments

  • triangle.jpg
    triangle.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 99
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top