What Is the Minimum Velocity for Particle Collision to Form New Particles?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle collision problem in the context of relativistic physics, specifically focusing on the minimum velocity required for a particle to collide and form new particles. The original poster presents a scenario involving a particle with a rest mass of 3m colliding with another at rest, resulting in the formation of two new particles, each with a rest mass of 2.5m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of energy and momentum equations related to the collision. Questions arise regarding the equality of energy for both particles and the correctness of the momentum equation. There is also a discussion about the implications of minimum velocity and the center of mass frame.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on specific concepts such as the center of mass frame and the conditions for minimum energy. Some participants express uncertainty about their understanding of the momentum equation and the implications of the particles moving together post-collision.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating complex concepts in relativistic physics, including invariant mass and energy conservation. There is an emphasis on understanding the conditions under which the collision occurs, particularly in relation to the center of mass frame and the minimum energy required for particle formation.

PhMichael
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle having a [tex]3m[/tex] rest mass is moving with velocity [tex]v[/tex] towards another particle, which is at rest and having a rest mass of [tex]m[/tex]. After the collision, two new particle are formed, each having a rest mass of [tex]2.5m[/tex]

I'm required to find the minimum velocity for which such a process occurs.

2. The attempt at a solution

(1) conservation of energy:

[tex]\gamma \cdot 3mc^{2} + mc^{2} = 2 \sqrt{p^{2}c^{2}+(2.5m)^{2}c^{4}}[/tex]

(2) conservation of momentum:

[tex]\gamma \cdot 3mv = 2p[/tex]

solving these two equations with [tex]\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}}[/tex], we get:

[tex]v = \frac {\sqrt{21}}{5} c[/tex]

This answer is correct, but I have several questions regarding my own solution (LOL):

1) why is the energy of both particles equal?

2) why is equation no.(2) correct? in other words, why is the momentum of the new particles equal? and why is it assumed that they both will move along the same direction that the 3m particle has moved?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PhMichael said:
1) why is the energy of both particles equal?
The answer to this question (and the next) lies in the statement of the problem "find the minimum velocity for which such a process occurs". What must be true if the velocity is minimum? Hint: Think center of mass.

2) why is equation no.(2) correct? in other words, why is the momentum of the new particles equal? and why is it assumed that they both will move along the same direction that the 3m particle has moved?
See above.
 
Well, actually, I didn't even consider the center of mass frame in my solution and still, with great luck, I got it right ... Can you please expand your explanation!? ... to be more specific, I don't really underatand the momntum equation.
 
Minimum velocity of the projectile particle means that there is just barely enough energy to produce the two particles. What does that say about the energy of the daughter particles in their CM frame? What should that energy be?
 
Let me see if I got that right:

I should look for the final situation in which the two particles exist with the minimum possible energies; in this case, they will have no velocity relative to each other, that is, the two product particles will move together as a glob with respect to the lab frame.

right?
 
PhMichael said:
Let me see if I got that right:

I should look for the final situation in which the two particles exist with the minimum possible energies; in this case, they will have no velocity relative to each other, that is, the two product particles will move together as a glob with respect to the lab frame.

right?
Right, and in the center of mass frame instead of the lab frame that velocity would be ...?
 
kuruman said:
Right, and in the center of mass frame instead of the lab frame that velocity would be ...?

well this glob's velocity is with respect to the lab frame so if I'm going to take it with respect to the glob's frame, it's supposed to be zero. right?
 
PhMichael said:
well this glob's velocity is with respect to the lab frame so if I'm going to take it with respect to the glob's frame, it's supposed to be zero. right?
You missed the point of what I am trying to say to answer your initial question. Imagine being an observer moving at the velocity of the center of mass. That's a velocity that is constant as long as momentum is conserved. When the glob is formed, it has zero velocity with respect to its center of mass. Therefore, it is also zero with respect to the observer. So if you transform back to the lab frame, since the particles making up the glob have the same mass and are at rest with respect to the CM frame, they should have the same energy in the lab frame.
 
Last edited:
actually, I've used the conserved invariant [tex]E^{2} - (pc)^{2 } = (mc^{2})^{2}[/tex] in the following manner:

Before collision - lab frame:

Total energy: [tex]E+mc^{2}[/tex]
Total momentum: [tex]p[/tex]

where E and p stand for the energy and momentum of the 3m particle, respectively.

After collision - glob's frame:

Total energy: [tex]2(2.5m)c^{2} = 5mc^{2}[/tex]
Total momentum: [tex]0[/tex]

Now, i'll used the mentioned invariant:

[tex](E+mc^{2})^{2}-(pc)^{2} = (5mc^{2})^{2}[/tex]

from this I get the energy of the 3m particle: [tex]E=\frac{15}{2}mc^{2}[/tex], and using the fact that [tex]E=\frac{3mc^{2}}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^{2}}}[/tex], i can find the velocity to be:
[tex]v=\frac{\sqrt{21}}{5}c[/tex]
just like before, but now with a bit of understanding =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K