What Is the Minimum Velocity Needed for a Wheel to Climb a Step?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TyloBabe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Rolling
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid wheel of mass M and radius R that rolls without slipping and collides inelastically with a step of height h, which is less than R. The objective is to determine the minimum velocity v required for the wheel to successfully climb the step, considering the constraints of inelastic collision and conservation of angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of angular momentum and the implications of the inelastic collision on energy conservation. There are questions about the appropriate points to consider for calculating angular momentum and the role of friction during the collision.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of angular momentum conservation and the effects of torque. Some guidance has been offered regarding the choice of reference points for calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the exact approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the inelastic nature of the collision and the need to account for both translational and rotational energies in their reasoning. There is also mention of the challenge posed by the frictional forces acting on the wheel during the collision.

TyloBabe
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid wheel of mass M and radius R rolls without slipping
at a constant velocity v until it collides inelastically with a step of height h < R.
Assume that there is no slipping at the point of impact. What is the minimum
velocity v in terms of h and R needed for the wheel to climb the step?


Homework Equations


Not sure. Perhaps conservation of Angular Momentum. We can not use energy because the collision is inelastic.


The Attempt at a Solution


I really have no clue. I know that Angular Momentum is conserved because the only real external force acting on the system is when the disc encounters the corner of the step, but that force always acts radially and so there is no torque.

I can only think that maybe the angular momentum about the discs radius, as well as about the point h, is conserved throughout the entire collision. Where do I begin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi TyloBabe! :smile:
TyloBabe said:
Perhaps conservation of Angular Momentum. We can not use energy because the collision is inelastic.

Yes and no …

only the collision is inelastic, so you will need to use conservation of https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=313" to find the angular velocity immediately after the collision …

but from then on you can assume that energy is conserved. :wink:
I really have no clue. I know that Angular Momentum is conserved because the only real external force acting on the system is when the disc encounters the corner of the step, but that force always acts radially and so there is no torque.

No, there is a torque, because the friction is tangential to the disc.

Since you don't know how much the friction is, the place to take moments about is … ? :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What I was thinking was saying that the initial angular momentum about the center of the disc, would be equal to the angular momentum of the disc about the point of contact on the step. Would that be correct?

I see what you mean about the torque. The normal force on the disc at the step acts radially, but the frictional force from the step acts tangentially in the opposite direction of motion.

Then if I can figure out what that velocity is just after the collision, and then use conservation of energy, i would just have to say that the rotational energy about the step would be equal to the rotational, translational, and gravitational energy just after the disc has made it over the step. Correct me if I'm mistaken, please.
 
Hi TyloBabe! :smile:
TyloBabe said:
What I was thinking was saying that the initial angular momentum about the center of the disc, would be equal to the angular momentum of the disc about the point of contact on the step. Would that be correct?

No, you can't change the point about which you measure the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=313"

Choose a point and stick to it!

In this case (btw, you didn't answer my question) that point would be the edge of the step … because there's no unknown https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=175" about the edge (the friction has no torque there)

(Don't forget to include the initial translational angular momentum!)
I see what you mean about the torque. The normal force on the disc at the step acts radially, but the frictional force from the step acts tangentially in the opposite direction of motion.

Then if I can figure out what that velocity is just after the collision, and then use conservation of energy, i would just have to say that the rotational energy about the step would be equal to the rotational, translational, and gravitational energy just after the disc has made it over the step. Correct me if I'm mistaken, please.

Sort of … don't forget that you only need the final angular velocity to be zero! :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K