What is the momentum operator in different bases and how can it be obtained?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The momentum operator in quantum mechanics is represented as -iħ∇ in the position basis and as p in the momentum basis. To derive the momentum operator in different bases, one must utilize the resolution of identity operators and perform integration by parts. The process involves inserting identity operators in both the momentum and position bases, leading to the final expression for the momentum operator acting on a wavefunction in the position basis. This method is essential for understanding the transformation of operators across different bases in Hilbert space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert space and state vectors
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics terminology, specifically wavefunctions
  • Knowledge of the momentum operator and its representations
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration by parts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the momentum operator in various bases
  • Learn about the resolution of identity in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of operator transformations in Hilbert space
  • Investigate the role of eigenvalues and eigenstates in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in operator theory and transformations in Hilbert space.

unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
If we assume a system (pure for now) is in a state described by a single state vector, how can you determine the momentum? The momentum of a wavefunction is simply -i times the gradient, but that's for a continuous function. In the hilbert space representation of psi as a ket vector, what does the momentum operator look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the position basis, it still looks like [itex]-i \hbar \vec \nabla[/itex]. In the momentum basis, it's simply [itex]p[/itex]. To obtain it in some other basis, you change basis in the standard way.

The best way to find the result of acting with [itex]\hat p[/itex] is to insert identity operators like so:

[tex]\begin{align}<br /> \hat{p} | \psi \rangle &= \int dp \; \hat{p} | p \rangle \langle p | \psi \rangle = \int dp \; p | p \rangle \langle p | \psi \rangle \\<br /> &= \int dp \; p | p \rangle \int dx \; \langle p | x \rangle \langle x | \psi \rangle \\<br /> &= \int dp \; | p \rangle \int dx \; p e^{-ipx} \psi(x) \\<br /> &= \int dp \; | p \rangle \int dx \; i \frac{d}{dx} \big( e^{-ipx} \big) \psi(x) \\<br /> &= \int dp \; | p \rangle \int dx \; e^{-ipx} \bigg( -i \frac{d}{dx} \psi(x) \bigg) \\<br /> &= \int dx \; \int dp \; | p \rangle \langle p | x \rangle \bigg( -i \frac{d}{dx} \psi(x) \bigg) \\<br /> &= \int dx \; | x \rangle \bigg( -i \frac{d}{dx} \psi(x) \bigg)<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
Here I've done these steps:

1. Insert the resolution of the identity in the p basis.
2. Since we're in the p basis, the p operator can be replaced by its eigenvalue on each basis ket.
3. Insert the resolution of the identity in the x basis (since our goal is to get the p operator in the x basis).
4. Use the fact that [itex]\langle p | x \rangle = e^{-ipx}[/itex].
5. Do standard calculus tricks, integrate by parts.
6. Observe that we have an identity in the p basis we can remove.
7. Finally, we see the action of the p operator in the x basis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K