MHB What is the name of this theorem in Abstract Algebra

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Hi,
There is a theorem in Abstract which said if g.c.d(x,y)= d (g.c.d the greatest common divisor between x and y) then there exist an integers a,b such that

ax + by = d

It is a corollary from Euclidean algorithm.

Does it has a name ?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amer said:
Hi,
There is a theorem in Abstract which said if g.c.d(x,y)= d (g.c.d the greatest common divisor between x and y) then there exist an integers a,b such that

ax + by = d

It is a corollary from Euclidean algorithm.

Does it has a name ?
Thanks in advance.

In...

Number Theory/Elementary Divisibility - Wikibooks, open books for an open world

... the theorem is indicated simply as 'theorem I'...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Thanks very much, you are great. :D
 
Not only do the integers $a$ and $b$ exist, but furthermore $d$ is minimal among all POSITIVE $\Bbb Z$-linear combinations of $x$ and $y$.

The reason this is important, is because $a,b$ are in general, not unique, but $d$ is. For example:

gcd(4,6) = 2, and we have:

2 = (1)(6) + (-1)(4) but also:

2 = (-5)(6) + (8)(4) (for example).

The Bezout identity is so useful that integral domains in which it holds are given their own name: Bezout domains (this is a slightly stronger condition than any two elements just having a gcd). These domains are "almost PID's (principal ideal domains)", they share many of the same properties of PID's, but do not have to be Noetherian.

Perhaps this is "too much information". Simpler version: there are many kinds of structures in which SOME of the intuitions we have from integers still apply, but not ALL of them.
 
Deveno said:
Not only do the integers $a$ and $b$ exist, but furthermore $d$ is minimal among all POSITIVE $\Bbb Z$-linear combinations of $x$ and $y$.

The reason this is important, is because $a,b$ are in general, not unique, but $d$ is. For example:

gcd(4,6) = 2, and we have:

2 = (1)(6) + (-1)(4) but also:

2 = (-5)(6) + (8)(4) (for example).

The Bezout identity is so useful that integral domains in which it holds are given their own name: Bezout domains (this is a slightly stronger condition than any two elements just having a gcd). These domains are "almost PID's (principal ideal domains)", they share many of the same properties of PID's, but do not have to be Noetherian.

Perhaps this is "too much information". Simpler version: there are many kinds of structures in which SOME of the intuitions we have from integers still apply, but not ALL of them.

Awesome additions, thanks
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
763
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
711
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
789
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
678
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
866
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K