What is the nature of the gravitational field and its relationship to matter?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter grav-universe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fabric Space-time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the gravitational field and its relationship to matter, particularly in the context of General Relativity (GR) and Special Relativity (SR). Participants explore concepts such as the fabric of space-time, the mechanisms behind length contraction and time dilation, and the properties of gravitational fields compared to other fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the fabric of space-time in GR is a mechanism that produces length contraction and time dilation in SR, while others question this interpretation.
  • There is a suggestion that the spacetime metric in GR is equivalent to the gravitational field, which some participants agree with, while others seek clarification on its physical reality.
  • Some argue that spacetime can be considered a type of matter, akin to other fields like the electromagnetic field, while others challenge the notion of gravity having localized energy.
  • Participants discuss the implications of measuring rods and clocks contributing to the curvature of spacetime, depending on their mass relative to larger celestial bodies.
  • There is a contention regarding whether the gravitational field is "real" or merely a conceptual framework, with differing opinions on the nature of fields in physics.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the definition of matter and its relationship to localized energy, particularly in the context of gravitational fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the gravitational field, its reality, or its relationship to matter. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the physicality of the fabric of space-time and the localization of gravitational energy.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of matter, assumptions about the nature of fields, and unresolved questions about the implications of gravitational interactions and their mathematical descriptions.

grav-universe
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
In GR, there is said to exist a fabric of space-time, and gravity is the warping of the fabric of space-time. Since GR is simply an extension of SR, the fabric of space-time should exist for both, then, both relating to the same universe and all, right? So could the fabric of space-time be considered the mechanism that physically produces length contraction and time dilation in SR? Why or why not?

If not, why do length contraction and time dilation occur, and why isn't the universe Galilean? Also, what is the fabric of space-time? :smile:
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes, that is that "standard" view of SR which you don't prefer.

I will interpret "fabric of spacetime" = spacetime metric.

In GR, the spacetime metric is the gravitational field.

In standard SR, distance and time are defined by the Minkowski metric.
 
atyy said:
Yes, that is that "standard" view of SR which you don't prefer.
:smile: If the fabric of space-time is said to physically produce length contraction and time dilation, then I prefer it, as it makes conceptual sense to me by introducing a mechanism rather than just unexplained distortions of perceived reality according to each particular frame, but I was incorrectly referring to it by a different name in that case.
 
Last edited:
Oh you LET traitor!

Actually, in GR matter and spacetime codetermine each other - spacetime is a sort of matter since it is the gravitational field, which is just another field like the electromagnetic field or the electron field. The main difference between the gravitational field and all other fields is that the gravitational field does not have localized energy. A second important property of the gravitational field is that it interacts with all other forms of matter, and so all forms of matter interact with each other via the gravitational field.
 
Last edited:
atyy said:
I will interpret "fabric of spacetime" = spacetime metric.

In GR, the spacetime metric is the gravitational field.

In standard SR, distance and time are defined by the Minkowski metric.
Right, okay, that would be the mathematics involved which describes the observations involved, but is the fabric of space-time considered to be physically real which acts as the true mechanism of space-time or is it only conceptual?
 
grav-universe said:
Right, okay, that would be the mathematics involved which describes the observations involved, but is the fabric of space-time considered to be physically real which acts as the true mechanism of space-time or is it only conceptual?

Spacetime=gravitational field

The gravitational field is "real", if you consider the electromagnetic field "real".

The gravitational field and matter (including your measuring rod and clock) codetermine each other.

Most often, you will see approximations in which your measuring rod and clock don't contribute to the curvature of spacetime, since their mass is small compared to the stars and planets. But in principle, according to GR, they do.
 
atyy said:
Oh you LET traitor!
:redface:

Actually, in GR matter and spacetime codetermine each other - spacetime is a sort of matter since it is the gravitational field, which is just another field like the electromagnetic field or the electron field. The main difference between the gravitational field and all other fields is that the gravitational field does not have localized energy. A second important property of the gravitational field is that it interacts with all other forms of matter, and so all forms of matter interact with each other via the gravitational field.
So it appears that you are saying that the fabric of space-time is physically real and is the cause of the space-time metric, determining how mass moves and behaves, as well as how fields interact. Okay, very cool, thanks. :smile:
 
atyy said:
Oh you LET traitor!

Actually, in GR matter and spacetime codetermine each other - spacetime is a sort of matter since it is the gravitational field, which is just another field like the electromagnetic field or the electron field. The main difference between the gravitational field and all other fields is that the gravitational field does not have localized energy.
Why?
The EM field has localized energy because it's associated with an object, right? If an object = matter and matter = energy, then why isn't gravity localized? Or is this what the LIGO and VIRGO are looking for?

And what do you mean by "spacetime is a sort of matter"?

Please forgive my ignorance, I'm not a trained physicist. :smile: Thanks
 
atyy said:
Spacetime=gravitational field

The gravitational field is "real", if you consider the electromagnetic field "real".

The gravitational field and matter (including your measuring rod and clock) codetermine each other.

Most often, you will see approximations in which your measuring rod and clock don't contribute to the curvature of spacetime, since their mass is small compared to the stars and planets. But in principle, according to GR, they do.
I don't consider the EM field to be real. A field is a concept.
 
  • #10
grav-universe said:
So it appears that you are saying that the fabric of space-time is physically real and is the cause of the space-time metric, determining how mass moves and behaves, as well as how fields interact. Okay, very cool, thanks. :smile:

That's fine, but I actually think of it a bit differently - since matter determines the gravitational field, it can be said that matter determines metric relations via the gravitational field.
 
  • #11
TheAlkemist said:
Why?
The EM field has localized energy because it's associated with an object, right? If an object = matter and matter = energy, then why isn't gravity localized? Or is this what the LIGO and VIRGO are looking for?

And what do you mean by "spacetime is a sort of matter"?

Please forgive my ignorance, I'm not a trained physicist. :smile: Thanks

If you define matter as that which has localized energy, then the gravitational field is not matter.

On the other hand, the gravitational field obeys differential equations just like the electromagnetic field, so it is just a field and is matter in that sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K