What is the Neurobiology of Intelligence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter selfAdjoint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intelligence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the review by Gray and Thompson regarding the neurobiology of intelligence, which synthesizes findings from twin studies, PET scans, fMRIs, lesion research, and molecular genetics. The review aims to address ethical considerations surrounding differential intelligence studies. Participants express skepticism about the novelty of the findings, suggesting that review articles typically consolidate existing knowledge rather than present groundbreaking discoveries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neurobiology concepts
  • Familiarity with neuroimaging techniques such as PET and fMRI
  • Knowledge of genetic influences on intelligence
  • Awareness of ethical implications in psychological research
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the full review by Gray and Thompson on neurobiology and intelligence
  • Explore the methodologies of twin studies in psychological research
  • Investigate the ethical considerations in differential intelligence studies
  • Learn about the implications of lesion research in understanding cognitive functions
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, psychologists, and educators interested in the intersection of neurobiology and intelligence, as well as those examining the ethical dimensions of intelligence research.

selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
6,839
Reaction score
11
Gray and Thompson have a magisterial review of this issue at http://www.loni.ucla.edu/~thompson/PDF/nrn0604-GrayThompson.pdf . They bring together twin studies, PET scans, fMRIs, lesion research, molecular genetics, and much else, and discuss the ethics of differential intelligence studies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Very interesting! :p I have only read the two first pages and browsed the rest. This does not seem revolutionary to me. Is this a new "discovery"?
 
Thallium said:
Very interesting! :p I have only read the two first pages and browsed the rest. This does not seem revolutionary to me. Is this a new "discovery"?

I haven't read it yet, but SelfAdjoint did say "review" which means it's an article that pulls together previous findings and tries to draw some sort of cohesive conclusion from them, or presents it in a way to point out the unanswered questions and/or gaps in current knowledge. Sometimes authors toss in a few new findings that aren't significant enough to stand alone in a separate article into a review article, but generally, one shouldn't expect anything really new in a review.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 238 ·
8
Replies
238
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K