What is the Normalized Ground State Energy of a 3-D Harmonic Oscillator?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the normalized ground state energy of a three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, specifically using spherical coordinates. Participants are exploring the mathematical formulation and separation of variables in the context of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use spherical coordinates and separation of variables but encounters difficulties in simplification. Some participants suggest considering Cartesian coordinates as an alternative approach. Others inquire about the specific steps taken and encourage showing more work to identify where the original poster is getting stuck.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's attempts, providing guidance on how to proceed with the separation of variables and the application of the Laplacian. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in the work shown, and some participants are questioning the assumptions made regarding the potential terms and their application in the equations.

Contextual Notes

The problem specifies the use of spherical coordinates, which may impose certain constraints on the approach taken. There is also mention of the original poster's struggle with the textbook material, indicating potential gaps in understanding that may affect their progress.

pprie003
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the normalized ground state energy for the 3-D Harmonic Oscillator

Homework Equations


V(r) = 1/2m(w^2)(r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with the wave fn in spherical coordinates, and have tried using sep of variables, but keep getting stuck when trying to simplify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome in PF!
Ok concerning your first problem, have you tried what you can end up with when you view the problem in Cartesian coordinates instead?
 
pprie003 said:

Homework Statement


What is the normalized ground state energy for the 3-D Harmonic Oscillator

Homework Equations


V(r) = 1/2m(w^2)(r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with the wave fn in spherical coordinates, and have tried using sep of variables, but keep getting stuck when trying to simplify.
That'll work, but we can't see what the actual problem is if you don't show any work.
 
Here is what I got:
## \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \Big[\frac {1} {r^2} \, \frac{∂}{∂r} \ \Big(r^2 \frac {∂}{∂r} \Big) \, + \frac {1} {r^2 \sinθ} \frac{∂}{∂θ} \, \Big( \sinθ \frac {∂} {∂θ} \Big) + \frac {1}{r^2 \sin^2θ} \, \frac {∂^2}{∂φ^2} \Big]ψ + \frac {1}{2} m \,ω^2 \, r^2ψ \ = Eψ##
Let ψ(r,θ,φ) = R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ)
 
Ok if you insist on working in spherical coordinate. Then the next step is substituting the separated wavefunction right, after which you will get separate differential equations each of which is only in ##r,\theta,## and ##\phi##. How do these equations look like?
 
pprie003 said:
Here is what I got:
## \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \Big[\frac {1} {r^2} \, \frac{∂}{∂r} \ \Big(r^2 \frac {∂}{∂r} \Big) \, + \frac {1} {r^2 \sinθ} \frac{∂}{∂θ} \, \Big( \sinθ \frac {∂} {∂θ} \Big) + \frac {1}{r^2 \sin^2θ} \, \frac {∂^2}{∂φ^2} \Big]ψ + \frac {1}{2} m \,ω^2 \, r^2ψ \ = Eψ##
Let ψ(r,θ,φ) = R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ)
This is hardly showing your work. Or if this is all you did, it doesn't really qualify yet as an attempt. If you're stuck at this point, you should go back and read your textbook, look at similar examples, and make some more headway before posting again. If you have a specific question, come back and ask that.
 
pprie003 said:
I started with the wave fn in spherical coordinates, and have tried using sep of variables, but keep getting stuck when trying to simplify.
Please show that, otherwise we can't tell where you got stuck which makes it impossible to help.

Using cartesian coordinates is easier here.
 
Sorry I left out info, I was having a hard time writing the code, but here is the rest of the work (the problem tells me to work in spherical coordinates):
## \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \Big[\frac {1} {r^2} \, \frac{∂}{∂r} \ \Big(r^2 \frac {∂}{∂r} \Big) \, + \frac {1} {r^2 \sinθ} \frac{∂}{∂θ} \, \Big( \sinθ \frac {∂} {∂θ} \Big) + \frac {1}{r^2 \sin^2θ} \, \frac {∂^2}{∂φ^2} \Big]ψ + \frac {1}{2} m \,ω^2 \, r^2ψ \ = Eψ##
Let ψ(r,θ,φ) = R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ)
##ΘΦ \Big[\frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1} {r^2} \, \frac{∂}{∂r} \ \Big(r^2 \frac {∂R}{∂r} \Big) + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, R \, \Big] + RΦ \Big[ \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1} {r^2 \sinθ} \frac{∂}{∂θ} \, \Big( \sinθ \frac {∂Θ} {∂θ} \Big) \, + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, Θ \Big] + RΘ \, \Big[ \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1}{r^2 \sin^2θ} \, \frac {∂^2Φ}{∂φ^2} \, + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, Φ\Big] = ERΘΦ##

Next Divide by ψ:

## \frac {1} {R} \, \Big[\frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1} {r^2} \, \frac{∂}{∂r} \ \Big(r^2 \frac {∂R}{∂r} \Big) + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, R \, \Big] + \frac {1} {Θ} \, \Big[ \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1} {r^2 \sinθ} \frac{∂}{∂θ} \, \Big( \sinθ \frac {∂Θ} {∂θ} \Big) \, + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, Θ \Big] + \frac {1} {Φ} \Big[ \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1}{r^2 \sin^2θ} \, \frac {∂^2Φ}{∂φ^2} \, + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, Φ\Big] = E ##

It is at this point that I get lost. When I did this same problem in cartesian coordinates it separated nicely. I'm not sure what to do next. Obviously I have read and re-read my textbook (which I believe is not suitable for an intro class) with no such luck. Some things I have thought about (from READING) is substituting the square of the angular momentum operator and its eigen value, but not entirely sure how to approach this. I'm not just seeking the correct solution, but rather how I can tie what I've read to the advice from someone else. I do appreciate the help.
 
  • #10
blue_leaf77 said:
Welcome in PF!
Ok concerning your first problem, have you tried what you can end up with when you view the problem in Cartesian coordinates instead?
Yes I did this problem, which separated nicely into 3 1-D Harmonic Oscillators, and was able to find the energy and first excited state wave fn as well as its degeneracy.
 
  • #11
You have too many terms from the potential.
pprie003 said:
Sorry I left out info, I was having a hard time writing the code, but here is the rest of the work (the problem tells me to work in spherical coordinates):
## \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \Big[\frac {1} {r^2} \, \frac{∂}{∂r} \ \Big(r^2 \frac {∂}{∂r} \Big) \, + \frac {1} {r^2 \sinθ} \frac{∂}{∂θ} \, \Big( \sinθ \frac {∂} {∂θ} \Big) + \frac {1}{r^2 \sin^2θ} \, \frac {∂^2}{∂φ^2} \Big]ψ + \frac {1}{2} m \,ω^2 \, r^2ψ \ = Eψ##
Let ψ(r,θ,φ) = R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ)
##ΘΦ \Big[\frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1} {r^2} \, \frac{∂}{∂r} \ \Big(r^2 \frac {∂R}{∂r} \Big) + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, R \, \Big] + RΦ \Big[ \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1} {r^2 \sinθ} \frac{∂}{∂θ} \, \Big( \sinθ \frac {∂Θ} {∂θ} \Big) \, + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, Θ \Big] + RΘ \, \Big[ \frac {- \hbar ^2} {2m} \, \frac {1}{r^2 \sin^2θ} \, \frac {∂^2Φ}{∂φ^2} \, + \frac {1} {2} m \, w^2 \, r^2 \, Φ\Big] = ERΘΦ##
When you applied the Laplacian to the wave function, you got
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left[\Theta\Phi \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 R') +R\Phi\frac{1}{r^2\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}(\sin\theta\ \Theta') + R\Theta\frac{1}{r^2\sin^2\theta}\Phi''\right].$$ That part was fine. Now you add in the potential term to get
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left[\Theta\Phi \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 R') +R\Phi\frac{1}{r^2\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}(\sin\theta\ \Theta') + R\Theta\frac{1}{r^2\sin^2\theta}\Phi''\right] + \frac 12 m\omega^2 r^2 R\Theta\Phi$$ for the lefthand side of the equation.

When you divide by ##R\Theta\Phi##, you'll be left with the term ##\frac 12 m\omega^2 r^2##. It only depends on ##r##, so group it in with the expression for the radial function.
 
  • #12
First of all the term ##\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 r^2## should appear only once.
 
  • #13
vela said:
You have too many terms from the potential.

When you applied the Laplacian to the wave function, you got
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left[\Theta\Phi \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 R') +R\Phi\frac{1}{r^2\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}(\sin\theta\ \Theta') + R\Theta\frac{1}{r^2\sin^2\theta}\Phi''\right].$$ That part was fine. Now you add in the potential term to get
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left[\Theta\Phi \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 R') +R\Phi\frac{1}{r^2\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}(\sin\theta\ \Theta') + R\Theta\frac{1}{r^2\sin^2\theta}\Phi''\right] + \frac 12 m\omega^2 r^2 R\Theta\Phi$$ for the lefthand side of the equation.

When you divide by ##R\Theta\Phi##, you'll be left with the term ##\frac 12 m\omega^2 r^2##. It only depends on ##r##, so group it in with the expression for the radial function.

I don't know why I did all that extra stuff. Still, won't this leave the ## \frac{1}{r^2}## in the angular terms? Should I factor out that term, then substitute the square of angular momentum operator?
 
  • #14
You can get rid of that ##r## dependence in those terms by multiplying both sides of the equation by ##r^2##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K