Studying What is the order to learn physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantum Velocity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
To effectively learn physics, it's essential to understand that it requires mastering both physics concepts and mathematical techniques simultaneously, as physics is fundamentally expressed through mathematics. A recommended starting point is classical mechanics, which includes Newtonian and Galileo principles, alongside foundational mathematics such as calculus and linear algebra. Following this, one can explore specialized fields like electrodynamics, thermodynamics, special relativity, and quantum mechanics, which necessitate knowledge of differential equations, probability theory, and multivariate calculus. As one progresses, the focus may shift to advanced topics such as general relativity, condensed matter physics, and quantum field theory, while the mathematical requirements become more specialized, including areas like Lie theory and differential geometry. The journey of learning physics is extensive and ongoing, emphasizing the importance of maintaining curiosity throughout the process.
Quantum Velocity
Messages
73
Reaction score
6
Hey guy!
I just want to know what order of physics i should learn to understand all of them.
So pleas help me!
Thanks you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To learn "all of them", which is pretty ambitious and could trigger a long debate on whether this is possible at all, you probably have to learn fundamental mathematical techniques in parallel. This is because physics is written in the language of mathematics. Therefore to learn physics is a bit like learning two new languages, since ordinary words become new and precise meanings in both languages: physics and mathematics.

But let as assume that you really want to follow that colorful and wonderful route. Then all what can be learned at school should be learnt. It is the foundation. Not always the last word of it, as you will experience on your journey, but a good start. This means physics usually start with classical mechanics, Newton's and Galileo's world, and the notion of frames and conservative forces. Along with it are calculus and linear algebra on the mathematical side of the coin. Then come some already a bit specialized fields like electrodynamics, thermodynamics and maybe special relativity and quantum mechanics. This means a bit theory of differential equations, probability theory, complex and multivariate calculus and a bit topology on the mathematical part. From here on the fields get split more and more into certain specialized parts: general relativity, condensed matter physics, nuclear physics, quantum field theory and all those which I have forgotten here to mention. On the mathematical side, you will have to learn less and less, as you do not need to specialize there or (in general) learn things like number theory or game theory. However, some parts will still add to your list: Lie theory, representation theory of groups and algebras, multilinear algebra and differential geometry.

This might look like a long journey already. Well, it is. And if you are really willing to take this adventure, there will be no end. Regardless how much you will have learned some day, there always will be more to learn. This may make it appear like an unreachable goal, but you will recognize, that it is in fact the most exciting part of it! So whatever you do: Stay curious!
 
  • Like
Likes Happiness and russ_watters
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K