What is the Original Speed of Linked Objects in Two Dimensions?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the original speed of two linked objects in a two-dimensional context, specifically focusing on their momentum before and after separation. The problem involves mass and velocity values for two objects, along with their directional components expressed in terms of angles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss expressing velocities as vectors and equating momentum before and after the separation. There are attempts to clarify the interpretation of directional information and the use of trigonometric methods to solve for the original speed.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods for vector addition and questioning the necessity of using trigonometry. Some participants express confusion about their diagrams and the correct approach to component analysis, while others provide feedback on the algebraic setup and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential misunderstandings regarding the initial directions of the objects and the need for clarity on whether they were indeed moving east before separation. Participants also note the importance of maintaining precision in calculations.

tiffanysnsd
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Object 1:
m1=1.9x10^4 kg
v1'= 972 m/s [E5.1*N]

Object 2:
m2=1.7x10^4 kg
v2'=944 m/s [E5.9*S]

Determine their original speed when they were linked together.

Homework Equations



Pti = Ptf
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2'
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to do a problem like this by expressing the velocities as vectors like (x,y), where x is the east component and y is the north component. Add the two final momentum vectors and equate that to the initial momentum vector and solve for the vector v. The to find the speed find the magnitude of v. I have can only guess what your direction information (like [E5.1*N]) means. 5.1 degrees east of north?
 
By E5.1N, I mean 5.1 degrees north of east; the two craft were traveling together in the east direction initially.

So, for a trigonometric solution, I would add p1' and p2' vectors, apply the cosine law to find p'. Then I would equate p' with v(m1+m2) and solve for v?

Is my algebraic solution in the original post fine? I will try the trig solution right now.
 
Like I said, I am not very good at trig so my attempt for a diagram got me even more confused (i don't think I am doing it right). This is what I came up with:

http://img199.yfrog.com/img199/8992/vectoraddition.jpg

where

p1' = m1v1'
=(1.9x10^4)(972)
=1.8x10^7

p2' = m2v2'
=(1.7x10^4)(944)
=1.6x10^7

p1' is at an angle of 5.1, p2' is at an angle of 5.9 (which is in the triangle because of the alternate pattern) and 180-5.1-5.9=169.

I know I am wrong, but I hope that by showing my work, you can help me get things right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't need a cosine law to add vectors. You just add them. But I may have been misjudging the level of your course. Have you done vectors? If you know the initial direction of both craft is east then you are doing the right thing. You are equating the eastward components of momentum before and after the collision. But I get an answer of more like 954m/s. You might not be keeping enough decimal places. You have the velocities to three decimal places. Try keeping three decimal places. But to two decimal places, your first answer is correct.
 
tiffanysnsd said:
Like I said, I am not very good at trig so my attempt for a diagram got me even more confused (i don't think I am doing it right). This is what I came up with:

http://img199.yfrog.com/img199/8992/vectoraddition.jpg

where

p1' = m1v1'
=(1.9x10^4)(972)
=1.8x10^7

p2' = m2v2'
=(1.7x10^4)(944)
=1.6x10^7

p1' is at an angle of 5.1, p2' is at an angle of 5.9 (which is in the triangle because of the alternate pattern) and 180-5.1-5.9=169.

I know I am wrong, but I hope that by showing my work, you can help me get things right.

Your diagram is sort of correct. But you can't equate the 5.9 angles unless you know the base is horizontal. And you aren't using vectors in your solution. But like I said before, I don't know that you are doing anything wrong. Did they tell you that both craft were heading exactly east before the separation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dick said:
You don't need a cosine law to add vectors. You just add them. But I may have been misjudging the level of your course. Have you done vectors? If you know the initial direction of both craft is east then you are doing the right thing. You are equating the eastward components of momentum before and after the collision. But I get an answer of more like 954m/s. You might not be keeping enough decimal places. You have the velocities to three decimal places. Try keeping three decimal places. But to two decimal places, your first answer is correct.

Yes, we have covered vectors before. I also get 954, since before I rounded off the sum of m1v1' and m2v2'. I'm glad that I at least have the answer right.

Dick said:
Did they tell you that both craft were heading exactly east before the separation?

Yes, the picture (of the problem) I have shows it. I'm happy that my triangle ediagram is correct.

Dick said:
But you aren't using vectors in your solution.

Oh. I guess when you said "Add the two final momentum vectors and equate that to the initial momentum vector and solve for the vector v" that was before you knew they were traveling east? If that's the case, how would I approach a graphical trig solution?
 
tiffanysnsd said:
Oh. I guess when you said "Add the two final momentum vectors and equate that to the initial momentum vector and solve for the vector v" that was before you knew they were traveling east?

Yes. You didn't tell us that. If they hadn't you should work it with vectors.
 
tiffanysnsd said:
If that's the case, how would I approach a graphical trig solution?

You would work out the two components of the vectors you labelled p1' and p2', add them and figure out the two components of the vector you labelled p'. Then find it's length.
 
  • #10
Dick said:
You would work out the two components of the vectors you labelled p1' and p2', add them and figure out the two components of the vector you labelled p'. Then find it's length.

Oh, so I would need 3 vector diagrams (one for x dimension, one for y, then the last one combining them)? It was my understanding that i added p1' and p2' without separating them into their components.
 
  • #11
Your diagram has two components, horizontal and vertical distance. A two dimensional vector is written like (x,y). Are you sure you studied vectors?
 
  • #12
Yes, though a bit rusty (been a long time). But what I mean about the 3 diagrams is:

First Diagram: p1x' + p2x' = px'
Second Diagram: p1y' + p2y' = py'
Third Diagram: px' + py' = p'

I hope that makes sense and I hope I follow you.
 
  • #13
No, no. They are all the same diagram. You ARE rusty. Can you split the momentum p1' for Spacecraft 1:
m1=1.9x10^4 kg
v1'= 972 m/s [E5.1*N]

into (E,N) components?
 
  • #14
Ohhh.

So it would be:
First: p1' = p1x' + p1y
Second: p2' = p2x' + p2y'
Third: p' = (p1x' + p2x') + (p1y' + p2y')

Splitting them up into the components would be:
x= (1.9x10^4)(972cos5.1)
y= (1.9x10^4)(972sin5.1)

I hope I didnt' screw anything up here, otherwise i really need to brush up.
 
  • #15
Right. The momentum vector for p1' is ((1.9x10^4)(972cos5.1),(1.9x10^4)(972sin5.1))*kg*m/s. But I'm still not sure you need to solve this problem that way.
 
  • #16
Thanks for the help. I just wanted to know how to do the trig solution, I don't really need to solve it that way for the assignment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K