What Is the Original Text of Example 6(c) in Calculus by Robert A. Adams?

  • Context: Calculus 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mcastillo356
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Text
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a specific example from the textbook "Calculus" by Robert A. Adams, focusing on the interpretation of a statement regarding average cost and marginal cost in the context of economics. Participants seek clarification on the original text of Example 6(c) and its implications.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests the original text of Example 6(c) from the textbook, indicating confusion over its content.
  • Another participant notes that in the 9th edition, Example 6 does not contain a (c) but rather Example 7 does, providing a paraphrase of the relevant content.
  • A participant questions the meaning of the phrase "because the cost is increasing at a rate lower than the average cost," seeking clarification on terms like "cost" and "rate." They express uncertainty about how to compare these concepts.
  • The same participant attempts to analyze the case of 1000 tons, referencing calculations from previous parts of the example to illustrate their understanding of average cost versus marginal cost.
  • Another participant expresses gratitude for the clarification received, indicating that they understood the explanation provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the interpretation of the statement regarding average cost and marginal cost, as participants express varying levels of understanding and seek further clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific calculations and terms from the textbook, but there is no resolution on the definitions or implications of the terms discussed, leaving some assumptions and interpretations unresolved.

mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
660
Reaction score
364
Hi, PF

I'm struggling with a sentence from the textbook "Calculus", by Robert A. Adams. At the second chapter, "Differentiation", seventh section, when it comes to talk about derivates in economics, at the example 6, the (c) question is answered in a way I don't understand. ¿Could anybody quote it the way is written originally, in English?

Greetings!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the 9th edition Example 6 does not have a (c) but Example 7 does

(c) If the production level x is increased slightly from x =1000, then the average cost per tonne will drop because the cost is increasing at a rate lower than the average cost. At x = 2000 the opposite is true; an increase in production will increase the average cost per tonne.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
Thanks, caz!

caz said:
In the 9th edition Example 6 does not have a (c) but Example 7 does

(c) If the production level x is increased slightly from x =1000, then the average cost per tonne will drop because the cost is increasing at a rate lower than the average cost. At x = 2000 the opposite is true; an increase in production will increase the average cost per tonne.

I don't know if I should post a new thread. The question is: what does it mean "because the cost is increasing at a rate lower than the average cost"?
-cost means marginal cost?
-"rate"? What rate? How can I compare a rate with the average cost per tonne? Is the average cost per tonne another rate?
 
mcastillo356 said:
Thanks, caz!
I don't know if I should post a new thread. The question is: what does it mean "because the cost is increasing at a rate lower than the average cost"?
-cost means marginal cost?
-"rate"? What rate? How can I compare a rate with the average cost per tonne? Is the average cost per tonne another rate?
Let’s do the 1000 ton case

In (a) you calculated that if you bought 1000 tons it would cost you $10.60 per ton.

In (b) you calculated that the instantaneous cost was $9.40 per ton. This means if you bought a little bit more, that little bit more would cost you $9.40 per ton.

So if you bought 1000+h tons the cost would be
1000*10.6 + h*9.4 < (1000+h)*10.6 so the new average cost will be less than before
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and mcastillo356
Thank you, caz! Inmediately understood
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
935
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
865