What is the output for my simple surveying calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiteboy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The user is seeking assistance with basic surveying calculations, specifically regarding the output of a tension calculation. After performing the calculation, they initially obtained a result of 1.070181445X10^-9, which they were unsure how to interpret. Upon reevaluation, they realized that they should have used 28134 instead of 28.134, leading to a corrected output of 1.07 mm. The user expresses uncertainty about their understanding but feels they may have resolved the tension calculation issue. Clarity on the correct interpretation of the output is still sought.
kiteboy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi hope somebody can help

Have some simple calculations to do for surveying (see attachment) but not sure what the output is I am getting

Its not homework its practice really ...the formulas are given so its really just a matter of figuring out what the output is I guess not sure

Been 20 years since I've done maths anywhere near this so forgive me if this is simple for everyone

Trying to figure out the tension calculation for example

I do the following in calculator (65-50) x 28.134/1.905X2.07x10^11

The answer I get is

1.070181445X10^-9

But I have no idea what that means I am guessing its 1.07mm? Or have I done it all wrong
Can anybody help?
 

Attachments

  • surveycalcs.jpg
    surveycalcs.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 488
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think I may have figured it out for tension at least

Should have put 28134 rather than 28.134 so that does come out as 1.07 mm

I THINK :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top