What is the pattern in this sequence and can it be proved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natasha1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying which powers of numbers in a given arithmetic sequence (2, 5, 8, 11, 14...) are included in the sequence and which are not. Participants are exploring the general term of the sequence and attempting to prove their findings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the general term of the sequence, expressed as 3n + 2, and discussing the implications of squaring this term. There are questions about the correct expansion of the squared term and its relation to the sequence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the polynomial expansion. Some participants suggest revisiting earlier steps in the problem to clarify the approach, indicating a collaborative effort to refine understanding.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the indexing convention for sequences, which may affect how terms are identified. Participants are also navigating potential confusion regarding the starting index of the sequence.

Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
This is my question: Which powers of numbers in the sequence below are always in the sequence and which are not. Prove it?

Sequence: 2, 5, 8, 11, 14...

Answer:
So the gerenal term is 3n + 2

Now
(3n+2)^2 = 9n^2 + 12n +4

Where should I go from here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Natasha1 said:
This is my question: Which powers of numbers in the sequence below are always in the sequence and which are not. Prove it?

Sequence: 2, 5, 8, 11, 14...

Answer:
So the gerenal term is 3n + 2

Now
(3n+2)^2 = 9n^2 + 6n + 4

Where should I go from here?


I think that should be 9n^2 + 12n + 4
 
Conventionally, [itex]\mathbb{N}[/itex] is the index set of sequence. This means that when identifying the general term, it must be that a1 is the first term in the sequence. The way you wrote an, a0 is your first term.

It's no big deal, it just avoids confusion.

I suggest you go back to your iniital problem before tacking this one as the method of proof is very similar and you're just one step away from the final solution in the other problem.
 
When you expand (3n + 2)^k into a polynomial, every term except for the constant term must be divisible by 3.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K