MHB What is the percent magnification of the microscope?

curtis2929
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A virus 3.0 X 10^-5 cm long appears to be 1.2cm long through a microscope. What is the percent magnification of the microscope?
Answer is 4000000. How did u get this answer?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Take the perceived length, divide by the actual length, and then multiply by 100 to get the percentage of magnification $M$:

$$M=\frac{1.2\text{ cm}}{3.0\E{-5}\text{ cm}}\cdot100=4000000$$
 
Tyvm. I'll try figure out how you got it:)
 
curtis2929 said:
Tyvm. I'll try figure out how you got it:)

I just plugged the numbers into a calculator, but we could do it easily by hand:

$$M=\frac{1.2\text{ cm}}{3.0\E{-5}\text{ cm}}\cdot100$$

Cancel the cm units, and bring the 10 with the negative exponent up to the numerator with a positive exponent and use $100=10^2$:

$$M=\frac{1.2\E{5}}{3.0}\cdot10^2$$

Like bases, so add exponents:

$$M=\frac{1.2\E{7}}{3.0}$$

Multiply by $$1=\frac{10}{10}$$:

$$M=\frac{12\E{7}}{30}=\frac{12}{3}\E{6}=4.0\E{6}=4000000$$
 
Awesome I got it tyvm
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top