What is the Perpetual Motion Machine using Magnets?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kmm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of perpetual motion machines (PMMs) using magnets, highlighting the fundamental principle that magnetic fields do not perform work due to their perpendicular force relative to displacement. The conversation emphasizes that true PMMs violate the law of conservation of energy, as they cannot operate without an energy input. The user questions whether a configuration of magnets could perform work indirectly through the electric field generated by moving charges, while also considering the role of thermal excitation in sustaining energy. Ultimately, the forum moderator closes the thread, citing the prohibition of PMM discussions as per forum rules.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and forces
  • Familiarity with the law of conservation of energy
  • Knowledge of electric fields and their relationship to moving charges
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamics and energy transfer
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electromagnetism, focusing on magnetic forces and work
  • Study the law of conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Explore the relationship between electric fields and magnetic fields in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate thermodynamic systems and the role of thermal energy in energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and energy conservation, particularly in the context of theoretical discussions about perpetual motion machines.

kmm
Messages
188
Reaction score
15
First, this is not a post about perpetual motion machines, although thinking about perpetual motion machines made me think of some issues. Something that is bothering me is the idea of a magnetic force not doing work. Well sort of. It’s completely clear to me that the magnetic field does no work since the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the displacement. \mathbf{F} = q( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} ) and W = \int \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{x}
What’s made me confused is I’ve come across some claimed perpetual motion machines. I understand that true perpetual motion machines cannot exist because something that does work without the input of energy violates conservation of energy. But I’m hung up on what could be called a “perpetual motion machine” such as a water wheel, but using magnets. A water wheel can do work, but obviously energy is being put into it by the flowing water. When it comes to magnets, a magnet can indirectly do work such as lifting a paper clip or another magnet. But in that case I assume that the work is actually done by the electric field of displaced of moving charges(electrons) towards the magnet. The magnetic force changes the directions of the electrons towards the magnet, then the electric field from the electrons pulls the lattice of the wire with it, so it’s the electric field doing work. This brings up a question I’m struggling to answer. Could some arrangement of magnets then be put together to do work(even if it isn’t done directly by the magnetic field)? If so, when would it stop producing work? I know the energy density associated with a magnetic field, W = \frac{1} {2 \mu_o} \int B^2 d \tau which is attributed to the energy required to create the field, so I would think that the magnetic field would continue to diminish as work was being done. But could thermal excitation of the electrons from outside the system continue to provide energy to the electrons and therefore the magnetic field so that this thermal excitation would act as the water in the water wheel? What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phy_infinite said:
First, this is not a post about perpetual motion machines, although thinking about perpetual motion machines made me think of some issues. Something that is bothering me is the idea of a magnetic force not doing work. Well sort of. It’s completely clear to me that the magnetic field does no work since the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the displacement. \mathbf{F} = q( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} ) and W = \int \mathbf{F} \cdot d \mathbf{x}
What’s made me confused is I’ve come across some claimed perpetual motion machines. I understand that true perpetual motion machines cannot exist because something that does work without the input of energy violates conservation of energy. But I’m hung up on what could be called a “perpetual motion machine” such as a water wheel, but using magnets. A water wheel can do work, but obviously energy is being put into it by the flowing water. When it comes to magnets, a magnet can indirectly do work such as lifting a paper clip or another magnet. But in that case I assume that the work is actually done by the electric field of displaced of moving charges(electrons) towards the magnet. The magnetic force changes the directions of the electrons towards the magnet, then the electric field from the electrons pulls the lattice of the wire with it, so it’s the electric field doing work. This brings up a question I’m struggling to answer. Could some arrangement of magnets then be put together to do work(even if it isn’t done directly by the magnetic field)? If so, when would it stop producing work? I know the energy density associated with a magnetic field, W = \frac{1} {2 \mu_o} \int B^2 d \tau which is attributed to the energy required to create the field, so I would think that the magnetic field would continue to diminish as work was being done. But could thermal excitation of the electrons from outside the system continue to provide energy to the electrons and therefore the magnetic field so that this thermal excitation would act as the water in the water wheel? What am I missing?

Welcome to the PF.

We do not discuss PMMs here on the PF -- it is in the list of forbidden topics in the PF Rules that you agreed to when you joined here. From the Rules link at the top of the page (under Site Info):

PF Banned Topics said:
Pseudoscience, such as (but not limited to):

Perpetual motion and "free energy" discussions
http://wiki.4hv.org/index.php/Free_Energy_Debunking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
http://www.skepdic.com/freeenergy.html
http://www.skepdic.com/perpetual.html

This thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K