What is the position of the mass over time in a damped spring system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Position
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a damped spring system involving a 1-kg mass attached to a spring, where participants explore the dynamics of the system under the influence of gravity and damping. The primary focus is on deriving the position of the mass over time after it is displaced and given an initial velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the differential equation governing the motion of the mass, questioning the correct setup of initial conditions and the direction of forces. There is exploration of both homogeneous and nonhomogeneous solutions, with some participants suggesting methods to find characteristic roots and particular solutions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into solving the differential equation, including the need to separate the problem into homogeneous and nonhomogeneous components. There is ongoing dialogue about the correct application of initial conditions and the role of gravitational force in the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the choice of positive direction for displacement and velocity, as well as the implications of damping on the system's behavior. There is a noted uncertainty about the treatment of the gravitational force in the context of the differential equation.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
A 1-kg mass, when attached to a large spring, stretches the spring a distance of 4.9 m.

(a) Calculate the spring constant.

my'' + uy' + ky = F(t)

F(t) = gravity = mg = 1 kg (9.8 m/s^2) = 9.8 N

m(0) + u(0) + ky = 9.8 N

y = 2 N/m


(b) The system is placed in a viscous medium that supplies a damping constant u = 3 kg/s. The system is allowed to come to rest. Then the mass is displaced 1 m in the downward direction and given a sharp tap, imparting an instantaneous velocity of 1 m/s in the downward direction. Find the position of the mass as a function of time and plot the solution.

my'' + uy' + ky = F(t)

m = 1
u = 3
y'(0) = -1
y(0) = -1
F(t) = 9.8

It says it was displaced downward and given a velocity in the downward direction.

y'' + 3y' + 2y = -9.8
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass is displaced downward and given an upward initial velocity. While you are free to choose any direction to be positive, you must be consistent. If you choose upward to be positive then your initial position if negative: y(0)= -1, y'(0)= 1, and F= -9.8. Also the resistance is always opposite the direction of motion and so the coefficient of y' is negative. the Most importantly, y and y' are NOT constants- those are only their values at t= 0.

Now, your differential equation is y"- 4y'+ 2y= -9.8 with initial conditions y(0)= -1, y'(0)= 1. You can solve that by finding its characteristic equation and characteristic roots.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
The mass is displaced downward and given and upward initial velocity. While you are free to choose any direction to be positive, you must be consistent. If you choose upward to be positive then your initial position if negative: y(0)= -1, y'(0)= 1, and F= -9.8. Also the resistance is always opposite the direction of motion and so the coefficient of y' is negative. the Most importantly, y and y' are NOT constants- those are only their values at t= 0.

Now, your differential equation is y"- 4y'+ 2y= -9.8 with initial conditions y(0)= -1, y'(0)= 1. You can solve that by finding its characteristic equation and characteristic roots.

Which is exactly what we've been doing.

It says it was displaced downward and given a velocity in the downward direction.

m = 1
u = 3
y'(0) = -1
y(0) = -1
F(t) = -9.8

y'' +3y' + 2y = -9.8

I'm not sure how to get the roots with an inhomogeneous equation. Typically, we'd just divide by e^lambda(t) or whatever with zero on the right and it would reduce to the simple lambda polynomial easily solved by the quadratic formula. If I don't use gravitation as the external force, I wouldn't have this issue.
 
Last edited:
You need to look at this as two problems: the homogeneous problem y'' + 3y' + 2y = 0, and the nonhomogeneous problem y'' + 3y' + 2y = -9.8.

It sounds like you know how to get the characteristic equation for the homogeneous problem, and solve it to get your two solutions that are exponential functions, and from that you should get yh = c1 er1t + c2 er2t, where r1 and r2 are the (known) roots of the characteristic equation.

For the nonhomogeneous problem, since the forcing function on the right side is a constant, try a particular solution of the form yp = A. Substitute this back into your nonhomogeneous equation to see what value you need for A.

Your general solution will be the solution to the homogeneous problem plus the particular solution. That is, yg = yh + yp.
 
Mark44 said:
You need to look at this as two problems: the homogeneous problem y'' + 3y' + 2y = 0, and the nonhomogeneous problem y'' + 3y' + 2y = -9.8.

It sounds like you know how to get the characteristic equation for the homogeneous problem, and solve it to get your two solutions that are exponential functions, and from that you should get yh = c1 er1t + c2 er2t, where r1 and r2 are the (known) roots of the characteristic equation.

For the nonhomogeneous problem, since the forcing function on the right side is a constant, try a particular solution of the form yp = A. Substitute this back into your nonhomogeneous equation to see what value you need for A.

Your general solution will be the solution to the homogeneous problem plus the particular solution. That is, yg = yh + yp.

Ah. We haven't gotten to those yet. Since we haven't, for this problem should I use -9.8 as the external force or not?
 
shackleford said:
I'm not sure how to get the roots with an inhomogeneous equation. Typically, we'd just divide by e^lambda(t) or whatever with zero on the right and it would reduce to the simple lambda polynomial easily solved by the quadratic formula. If I don't use gravitation as the external force, I wouldn't have this issue.
My explanation covered what you needed to do to solve your nonhomogeneous differential equation. Take another look at what I said in my previous post.

shackleford said:
Ah. We haven't gotten to those yet. Since we haven't, for this problem should I use -9.8 as the external force or not?
Of course you need to use this constant. Again, see what I wrote in my previous post.
 
Mark44 said:
My explanation covered what you needed to do to solve your nonhomogeneous differential equation. Take another look at what I said in my previous post.

Of course you need to use this constant. Again, see what I wrote in my previous post.

I'm just guessing here - I need to find a particular solution that's a constant to equal the forcing term value of -9.8. How about A = -4.9?
 
That works. Do you also have the solution to the homogeneous equation?
 
Mark44 said:
That works. Do you also have the solution to the homogeneous equation?

Let's see, the characteristic equation would be R^2 + 3R + 2.

(R+2)(R+1)

R = -1, -2.

y(t) = C1e^(-t) + C2e^(-2t)

y'(t) = -C1e^(-t) + -2C2e^(-2t)

y(0) = -1 = C1e^(-t) + C2e^(-2t) = C1 + C2 = -1

y'(t) = -1 = -C1e^(-t) + -2C2e^(-2t) = -C1 - 2C2 = -1
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Shackleford said:
Let's see, the characteristic equation would be R^2 + 3R + 2.
An equation has an = sign, so the char. equation would be R^2 + 3R + 2 = 0, from which you can say that (R+2)(R+1) = 0.
Shackleford said:
(R+2)(R+1)

R = -1, -2.

y(t) = C1e^(-t) + C2e^(-2)
Make that y(t) = C1e^(-t) + C2e^(-2t). Same fix needed below.
Shackleford said:
y'(t) = -C1e^(-t) + -2C2e^(-2)

y(0) = -1 = C1e^(-t) + C2e^(-2) = C1 + C2 = -1

y'(t) = -1 = -C1e^(-t) + -2C2e^(-2) = -C1 - 2C2 = -1

So, now solve for C1 and C2. Then your general solution will be the above, plus your particular solution, and you're home.
 
  • #11
Mark44 said:
An equation has an = sign, so the char. equation would be R^2 + 3R + 2 = 0, from which you can say that (R+2)(R+1) = 0.

Make that y(t) = C1e^(-t) + C2e^(-2t). Same fix needed below.

So, now solve for C1 and C2. Then your general solution will be the above, plus your particular solution, and you're home.

Yes. I know an equation has an equal sign. :-p I was just doing a little bit of shorthand. Thanks for your help so far. And, oops, I forgot the "t"s.
 
  • #12
Sure, you're welcome. Glad to do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K