What is the Power Loss in a Transformer?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding a poorly worded question about power loss in a transformer and its transmission line. Participants express frustration over the lack of clarity in the problem statement, particularly regarding whether the power loss refers to the transformer or the transmission line. The calculations for current and resistance are debated, with some suggesting that the resistance values provided (6000Ω and 200Ω) are inconsistent and potentially misleading. There is a consensus that the question lacks sufficient information to determine the actual power loss accurately. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of clear problem statements in educational contexts to avoid confusion.
  • #31
OK, only slightly off-topic...

I am so G%$D%$@ tired of students being confused and asking questions that are solely the result of the apparent fact that their instructor is an idiot or too lazy to write comprehensible questions. This seems to be about 80% of the EE questions I see here. I think it's really unfair to confuse people that are new to a subject. They just don't have the background to question the quality of their course work; they think they don't understand, when, in fact, it's not understandable.

Sorry, I'm frustrated and needed to vent. Y'all can go back to this seemingly unending discussion about missing information.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Delta2 said:
Ok but your solution attempt indicates that you are looking for the power loss in the secondary of the transformer.
That's what the answer key says the solution is, which I am trying to ask how they figured it out.
 
  • #33
annamal said:
That's what the answer key says the solution is, which I am trying to ask how they figured it out.
I think we have consensus that the given solution is nonsense.

My best guess is that the problem statement was supposed to tell you that the resistance of the transmission line is 200 Ohms (as assumed in the solution to part d), and that that value should have been used in part c, not 6000 Ohms. 200 still seems a bit high to me, but 6000 for a transmission line is ridiculous.

This is the message I sent to OpenStax:
Message: I wish to draw your attention to some misinformation on your website at https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-2/pages/15-6-transformers. Part c of the example 15.6, Step-Down Transformer, is nonsense.
The question is unanswerable with the given data because there is no way to determine the resistance of the transmission line. The 6000Ohms used in the solution appears to be the combined resistance of the transformer and the downstream load. (I believe typical transmission lines have resistances of a few tens of Ohms at most.)
 
  • Like
Likes annamal
  • #34
haruspex said:
My best guess is that the problem statement was supposed to tell you that the resistance of the transmission line is 200 Ohms (as assumed in the solution to part d), and that that value should have been used in part c, not 6000 Ohms. 200 still seems a bit high to me, but 6000 for a transmission line is ridiculous.

The ohmic resistance of a transmission line is really hard to estimate and depends on many factors.
In this example, the input power of the transformer is ##12KV\cdot 2A=24KW ##. If the ohmic resistance of the transmission line is 6000 ohms, then its ##~2^2\cdot6000=24kW~##power loss is as high as the input power of the transformer. I don't think the power company will accept it.
Also, this question is really confusing. If you get a reply from OpenStax, please share the answer to this unsolved mystery.
 
  • #35
OpenStax is riddled with errors like this.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vela and Delta2
  • #36
Mister T said:
OpenStax is riddled with errors like this.
What's funny is that this example is mentioned in the errata for the book and supposedly was reviewed/corrected just last year. Leaving out part (d) in the problem statement itself seems like a pretty big error to miss.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K