What is the Precise Heuristic Argument that Leads to Noether's Theorem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the interpretation of Noether's theorem, specifically seeking a precise heuristic argument that leads to the theorem. Participants explore the implications of continuous symmetries in the context of Lagrangian mechanics, with a focus on both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the interpretation of Noether's theorem for fields and notes that existing presentations in literature lack precision.
  • Another participant proposes that any continuous symmetry of the Lagrangian, which can be constructed from infinitesimal symmetries, implies a conserved quantity.
  • A participant clarifies their use of a 2D space analogy to illustrate the concept, stating that the exclusion of time does not affect their interest in the underlying idea.
  • One participant suggests a resource that may provide an elementary treatment of the topic, indicating uncertainty about the specific problem being addressed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects a lack of consensus, with participants presenting different interpretations and approaches to understanding Noether's theorem. Some participants seek clarity on the theorem's implications, while others focus on specific aspects of its formulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the assumptions underlying their interpretations, and there is an indication that the discussion may depend on the definitions and contexts used in the analysis of Noether's theorem.

liorde
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm confused about the exact interpretation of Noether's theorem for fields. I find that the statement of the theorem and its proof are not presented in a precise manner in books.
My main question is: what is the precise heuristic argument that leads to Noether's theorem?

The question is presented in the attached pdf document.

Thanks
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
what is the precise heuristic argument that leads to Noether's theorem?
precise argument is that any continuous symmetry of lagrangian i.e. which can be build up from infinitesimal ones implies a conserved quantity.Also you have forgotten the action in your two dimensional case i.e. where is time?
 
I excluded time because I used a 2D space analogy, which was easy to illustrate in a figure. I'm interested in the idea, so it doesn't matter if I use time or not.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K