What is the problem with the Stern Gerlach J=1 exercise?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics exercise involving helium atoms in an excited state passing through a Stern-Gerlach apparatus. Participants explore the calculations related to the deflection of atoms based on their magnetic quantum number (Mj) and the implications of atomic decay over time.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether all atoms produced remain in the excited state given the average decay time of 8000 seconds compared to the 1-hour duration in the box.
  • Another participant clarifies that the average decay time implies some atoms will have decayed, suggesting that not all atoms will be in the excited state.
  • There is a proposal that the three components Mj=1, 0, -1 should have equal probabilities of 33.3%, although this is later challenged based on the decay of excited atoms.
  • A participant calculates that approximately 55% of the atoms remain in the excited state after 1 hour, using an exponential decay model.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for the magnetic field value to evaluate energy states, as only the gradient is provided.
  • Another participant points out that the population of excited atoms is an exponentially decaying function, correcting a linear assumption made by a previous contributor.
  • There is a mention that in typical setups, the magnetic field is zero immediately after leaving the oven, which may affect calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the decay of atoms and the probabilities associated with the magnetic quantum states. There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating the probabilities, as some participants challenge the assumptions made by others.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the assumptions regarding atomic decay and the need for specific values of the magnetic field to evaluate energy states accurately. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying statistical mechanics to the problem.

folgorant
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello! i have a trouble with an exercise of a course of structure of matter.

Helium atoms in the excited state 23S1 come out from a box at v=2000 m/s and pass trough an Stern & Gerlach apparatus with dB/dz=25 T/m and length L=0.30m. Atoms spends 1 hour in the box and the average-time for decay is 8000s.
the questions are:

1) evaluate (number of atoms deflected with Mj=1) / (total number of atoms came out from the box)

2) evaluate the angular deflection of the component Mj=1.


So, the part 2 is very simple:
i know that the state has S=1, L=0, J=1 and using F = [tex]\mu[/tex]z * dB/dz I found alpha=0.30.

But I can't understand part 1:
8000s>1hours so every atom producted come out form the box and don't decay to the ground state??
then, don't the 3 components Mj= 1, 0, -1 should have the same probability 33.3% ?
Or I should use statistical mechanics and evaluate the probability of that state in function of temperature and energy?

please help me to understand, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
folgorant said:
But I can't understand part 1:
8000s>1hours so every atom producted come out form the box and don't decay to the ground state??
This seems irrelevant, but with an exponential decay process some atoms will have decayed, some will take longer than 8000 s to decay. 8000 s is the average decay time.

then, don't the 3 components Mj= 1, 0, -1 should have the same probability 33.3% ?
Sounds right to me. So the answer is _____ ?
 
the answer is: 21.25%
 
Okay, my mistake. After reading the original post more carefully, we need to divide the J=1 atoms by the TOTAL number of atoms. So the decay part of the problem is relevant after all.

So, you first need to figure out what percentage of the atoms are remaining in the 23S1 state. It's an exponential decay type of problem.
 
yes...
if N is total number of atoms;
y=1/8000 is the decay rate (number of decay/sec)
t= 1 hours = 3600sec is the period atoms be in the box

so: 1/8000 * 3600 * N = 0.45N i.e. the percentage of atoms remaining in excited state is 55%.

after this..i should evaluate the probably P(Mj=1)=[exp(-beta*E(Mj=1 state)]/[exp(-beta*E(Mj=1 state) + exp(-beta*E(Mj=0 state) + exp(-beta*E(Mj=-1 state)]...

where:
beta=1/(kT)
k= Boltzmann constant
T obtained from: 3/2 k T = 1/2 m v^2

but i should know the value of magnetic field to evaluate the energy states! instead i know only its gradient!

?
 
folgorant said:
yes...
if N is total number of atoms;
y=1/8000 is the decay rate (number of decay/sec)
t= 1 hours = 3600sec is the period atoms be in the box

so: 1/8000 * 3600 * N = 0.45N i.e. the percentage of atoms remaining in excited state is 55%.
No, the population of excited atoms is an exponentially decaying function. You are using a linear function, which is incorrect.

Using your formula, how many ground-state atoms are there after 8800 seconds? Look at the result you get ... do you see the problem?

after this..i should evaluate the probably P(Mj=1)=[exp(-beta*E(Mj=1 state)]/[exp(-beta*E(Mj=1 state) + exp(-beta*E(Mj=0 state) + exp(-beta*E(Mj=-1 state)]...

where:
beta=1/(kT)
k= Boltzmann constant
T obtained from: 3/2 k T = 1/2 m v^2

but i should know the value of magnetic field to evaluate the energy states! instead i know only its gradient!

?

Usually in this type of apparatus, B=0 immediately after leaving the oven. It is only after they have traveled some distance away from the oven exit that they enter the magnetic field.
 
thank you very much Redbelly98...now it's okay!
i've used: N=N(0)exp(-t/T) and then dividing for 3 the result is correct!

thanks...
 
You're welcome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
30K