What is the proof for 1+4+9+16+....=0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Qemikal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical proof of the divergent series 1 + 4 + 9 + 16 + ... equating to 0. Participants highlight that traditional operations on divergent series can lead to nonsensical results, emphasizing that methods like Ramanujan summation are necessary for assigning values to such series. The conversation also critiques the incorrect manipulation of infinite series, illustrating that adding or subtracting terms improperly can yield contradictions. Ultimately, the consensus is that while divergent series can be assigned values, the methods must adhere to established mathematical principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Divergent series and sums
  • Ramanujan summation techniques
  • Basic principles of infinite series
  • Understanding of mathematical proofs and contradictions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Ramanujan summation methods for divergent series
  • Explore the implications of assigning values to divergent series in string theory
  • Study the concept of Cesàro summation as an alternative approach
  • Watch Numberphile videos on assigning values to divergent series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical concepts related to divergent series and their applications in theoretical frameworks.

Qemikal
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Hello, I started to learn divergent series/sums, to practice I calculated some basic ones, you know: 1+2+3+4+5+6...= -1/12, but I really had problems when i tried to demonstrate that 1+4+9+16+...= 0(the sum of squares of natural numbers), I've tried to add, subtract etc, but I couldn't prove it, anyone here could help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Qemikal said:
I've tried to add, subtract etc, but I couldn't prove it, anyone here could help?
I guess you are referring to things like this? Forget it. Those calculations are mathematically nonsense, and you can get any result you like if you use those wrong operations. They are not the way those pseudo-limits are defined.

As an example, consider
1+1+1+1+... = X
Let's add 1 to both sides:
1+1+1+1+... = 1+X
But the left sides of both equations are identical, therefore, X=1+X.
Subtract X:
0=1.
 
mfb said:
I guess you are referring to things like this? Forget it. Those calculations are mathematically nonsense, and you can get any result you like if you use those wrong operations. They are not the way those pseudo-limits are defined.
I meant "adding" sums, like
S= 1-2+3-4+5... And adding S+S, it'll eventually give us 2*S=1-1+1-1+...
That's how we can assign values to these series => S= 1/4 (1-1+1-1+1...= 1/2 )
 
Qemikal said:
Hello, I started to learn divergent series/sums, to practice I calculated some basic ones, you know: 1+2+3+4+5+6...= -1/12, but I really had problems when i tried to demonstrate that 1+4+9+16+...= 0(the sum of squares of natural numbers), I've tried to add, subtract etc, but I couldn't prove it, anyone here could help?

What about ##1 + 4 + 9 + 16 \dots = 1 +(-1 + 1) + 4 + (-5 + 5) + 9 + (-14 + 14) + 16 + (-30 + 30) \dots = 0 + 5 - 5 + 14 - 14 + 30 - 30 + \dots = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 \dots = 0##

Although:

##1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 \dots = 1 + (-1 + 1) + 2 + (-3 + 3) + 4 + (-7 + 7) + 5 + (-12 + 12) \dots) = 0##

Looks like they all sum to 0.
 
Qemikal said:
That's how we can assign values to these series => S= 1/4 (1-1+1-1+1...= 1/2 )
You can, but those values are meaningless. See the example I put in my post, you can easily make contradictions like that.

It is not what mathematicians do to assign values to those series!
 
mfb said:
As an example, consider
1+1+1+1+... = X
Let's add 1 to both sides:
1+1+1+1+... = 1+X
But the left sides of both equations are identical, therefore, X=1+X.
Subtract X:
0=1.
I wrote that I add sums, in general, mathematicians do that, but in this example you added 1 to an infinite series that's wrong, infinity + 1 = infinity.

As written in that wikipedia article mathematician 'assign' the values to series, maybe equal is much said, but how to assign 0 to the 1+4+9+... would be a better formulation of the question.

This method of assigning is used in many papers(including string theory).
A video from Numberphile would explain visually what I mean:
but I would like to know how to do this for 1+4+9+... series.
 
Qemikal said:
I wrote that I add sums, in general, mathematicians do that
Not in the way you wrote here, no.
Qemikal said:
but in this example you added 1 to an infinite series that's wrong
That is my point, the operations you do with the series are wrong.
Qemikal said:
As written in that wikipedia article mathematician 'assign' the values to series, maybe equal is much said, but how to assign 0 to the 1+4+9+... would be a better formulation of the question.
There are various methods, in this particular case it is Ramanujan summation. More options (which can lead to different answers for the same series) are listed here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrewD
mfb said:
Not in the way you wrote here, no
How would be a correct way to write it?
mfb said:
There are various methods, in this particular case it is Ramanujan summation.
kkFr8UE.jpg

I would like to know the steps he applied to be able to assign 0 to the middle series.
[PLAIN]http://QUOTE="mfb, post: 5498284, member: 405866"]Not in the way you wrote here, no[/QUOTE] [/PLAIN]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Qemikal said:
I would like to know the steps he applied to be able to assign 0 to the middle series.
See the section above, "Summation".
 
  • #11
As mfb said,
Those calculations are mathematically nonsense
This misuse of divergent series has been discussed numerous times here at PF.
Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K