What is the proof for dim U = 3(3-r) in a 3x3 matrix over field K?

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between the dimension of a subspace U of 3x3 matrices and the rank of a matrix A over a field K. The original poster seeks to understand how the dimension of U is expressed as dim U = 3(3-r), where r is the rank of matrix A.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the rank of matrix A and its relationship to the kernel and image of the matrix. There are questions about how the dimension of the kernel relates to the columns of the matrix and the overall dimension of U.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with some participants attempting to clarify the relationship between the rank of A and the dimensions of the kernel and image. Questions remain about the reasoning behind the expression for dim U and how it is derived from the properties of the matrix.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and implications of rank, kernel, and image in the context of linear algebra, particularly in relation to 3x3 matrices. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the topic, and some participants express difficulty in understanding the connections being made.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
there is a matrix A of M3X3 (K) over field K
so rank A=r , marked U as A of M3X3 (K) so AX=0

prove that dim U=3(3-r))
??i was told that each column gives me 3-r we have 3 columns so
it 3(3-r)

i can't understand how we get 3-r out of each column??

there is W={x exists in R^3|Ax=0}
dim W=3-r
1-1 function hase Ker (t)=0
Im (T)=WxWxW

i understand that W is the kernel of T
then they say

"dim W=3-r"
so '"r" is the Image of the matrix
but why its from one column
??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
transgalactic said:
there is a matrix A of M3X3 (K) over field K
so rank A=r , marked U as A of M3X3 (K) so AX=0

prove that dim U=3(3-r))
??


i was told that each column gives me 3-r we have 3 columns so
it 3(3-r)

i can't understand how we get 3-r out of each column??
This is very hard to understand! I assume you mean that A is a 3 by 3 matrix having rank r and U is the subset of 3 by 3 matrices, X, such that AX= 0. The fact that A has rank 3 means that its image, A(K3), has dimension r. That also means that only r of its columns, thought of as vectors in K3, are independent and that kernel of A, the set of vectors, v, in K3 such that Av= 0 has dimension 3-r. If AX= 0, then X must have image a subset of the kernel of A: X must have rank less than or equal to 3-r.
 
how did they prove that
dim U=3(3-r)
??
 
whats A(k^3)
??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K