What is the proof for Dirichlet's formula for integrals in atomic theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andresordonez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of Dirichlet's formula for integrals, specifically the equation \int_0^\infty\mathrm{d}x \int_x^\infty F(x,y)\mathrm{d}y = \int_0^\infty\mathrm{d}y\int_0^yF(x,y)\mathrm{d}x. A user seeks references for this proof, noting its connection to atomic theory. A response points to a proof found in "Differential and Integral Calculus Vol. II" by Richard Courant, suggesting the use of the Leibniz rule to demonstrate that the function \varphi(t) is constant, ultimately leading to the conclusion that \varphi(t) \equiv \varphi(0) = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically double integrals.
  • Familiarity with the Leibniz rule for differentiation under the integral sign.
  • Knowledge of continuous functions and their properties.
  • Basic concepts in atomic theory related to integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Dirichlet's formula as presented in "Differential and Integral Calculus Vol. II" by Richard Courant.
  • Learn about the Leibniz rule for differentiation under the integral sign.
  • Explore applications of Dirichlet's formula in atomic theory and related fields.
  • Investigate other integral identities and their proofs in advanced calculus literature.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those focused on calculus and its applications in atomic theory, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of integral identities.

andresordonez
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm reading a paper about integrals that occur frequently in atomic theory, and the Dirichlet formula is mentioned.

\int_0^\infty\mathrm{d}x \int_x^\infty F(x,y)\mathrm{d}y = \int_0^\infty\mathrm{d}y\int_0^yF(x,y)\mathrm{d}x

I'd like to see the proof of this formula, in what book can I look for it?

I googled it but only found a reference to it, in what might be an equivalent form (is it?).

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DirichletsFormula.html

Most of the results of the search are related to the class number formula (I don't have idea about number theory but I guess this isn't what I'm looking for)

Doesn't seem to be a very famous formula or maybe it is known with another name. Anyway, I'd like to see where does it come from.

Thanks!
(by the way, if you find anything wrong with my english please let me know)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a particular case of "[URL theorem[/URL].

This http://kr.cs.ait.ac.th/~radok/math/mat9/04c.htm" gives a proof of the desired result. I think it is from Differential and Integral Calculus Vol. II by Richard Courant, which I guess is reprinted online.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Set \varphi(t):=\int_{0}^{t}\int_{x}^{t}F(x,y)dydx-\int_{0}^{t}\int_{0}^{y}F(x,y)dxdy and show by Leibniz rule (provided that F is continuous) that \varphi^{\prime}(t)\equiv0, i.e., \varphi is a constant function.
Then, complete the proof by using \varphi(t)\equiv\varphi(0)=0 for all t.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K