What is the quantum spin of a single electron in an (atomic) orbital?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The quantum spin of the valence electron in a silver atom during the Stern-Gerlach experiment is fundamentally random until measured, as there is no magnetic field in the furnace to dictate its orientation. The second electron in an orbital must possess opposite spin to the first to maintain the integrity of the orbital configuration. This phenomenon can be described using a density matrix, which illustrates the randomness of quantum states. The appropriateness of the orbital model, particularly in the context of Hartree-Fock and density functional theory, remains a topic of debate among physicists.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Stern-Gerlach experiment
  • Knowledge of electron orbitals and spin
  • Basic concepts of density matrices and wave functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Hartree-Fock approximation in quantum chemistry
  • Explore density functional theory and its implications for electron orbitals
  • Study the implications of quantum superposition in measurement
  • Investigate the role of magnetic fields in quantum spin behavior
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in atomic structure and electron behavior in quantum systems.

Curious Cat
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I wrote a little (computer) program to fill in the atomic electron
configuration one electron at a time, for children, and it got me
thinking, about this.
What is the quantum spin of the valence electron in the silver atom in
the furnace in the Stern-Gerlach experiment?
. Up, down, at random, alternating, in a (quantum) superposition (of
both), or none? Does it even have/get one until it's measured/observed
/needed?
. Does the second electron, in an orbital, have to have the opposite
spin to start, with, or is it made to conform?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the furnace, the quantum spin of the valence electron of the silver atom should be random, no? There is no magnetic field inside the furnace relative to which there would be any reason that it should be up, or down.
(This can be described by using a density matrix instead of a wave function. One reason for using that description is that it makes it clear that there is no difference whether you assume that one half is up and the other half down, or that one half is left and the other half right, or that a quarter is respectively up, down, left, and right, or that the state is basically just totally random. ... But that goes into territory where only very patient children would be able to follow.)

The second electron in an orbital has the opposite spin of the first electron in the same orbital, otherwise it would be wrong to claim that both electrons are in the same orbital. Whether the orbital picture itself is fully appropriate is a separate question.
(Advanced level explanation: the orbitals which arise from the Hartree-Fock approximation cannot be fully appropriate. However, orbitals also arise from density functional theory computations, and there it is less clear whether they are appropriate or not, even so their exact interpretation remains unclear.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K