What is the radius of the circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GJBenn85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Radius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The radius of a circle can be calculated using the formula s = rθ, where 's' is the arc length and 'θ' is the central angle in radians. In the discussed problem, an arc of 3 feet subtends a central angle of 1.8 radians, leading to a calculated radius of approximately 1.7 feet when considering significant figures. The discussion emphasizes the importance of reporting answers with the correct number of significant digits, as well as the common confusion around converting units and interpreting angles in radians.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the formula s = rθ for arc length calculation
  • Knowledge of radians and their application in circular geometry
  • Familiarity with significant figures in mathematical reporting
  • Basic calculus concepts related to solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of significant figures in mathematical calculations
  • Learn more about converting between radians and degrees
  • Explore advanced applications of circular geometry in calculus
  • Practice solving problems involving arc length and radius using s = rθ
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics or physics, educators teaching geometry or calculus, and anyone interested in mastering the concepts of circular motion and measurement accuracy.

GJBenn85
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
"Use the formula s = rθ ( "θ" is NOT an 8) to solve the following problem. An arc of 3 feet subtends a central angle of 1.8 radians. What is the radius of the circle?"

How do I do this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GJBenn85 said:
"Use the formula s = rθ ( "θ" is NOT an 8) to solve the following problem. An arc of 3 feet subtends a central angle of 1.8 radians. What is the radius of the circle?"

How do I do this problem?

It might help to know what "the formula s = rθ" means.
(arc length)=(radius)(central angle subtended).

Could you do the problem if the angle is 2\pi=2(3.1415...) radians?
 
Nevermind...think I figured it out.

Radius of 1.666666667 feet, or 20 inches sound right?
 
GJBenn85 said:
Nevermind...think I figured it out.

Radius of 1.666666667 feet, or 20 inches sound right?
Yes it does.

Alex
 
GJBenn85 said:
Nevermind...think I figured it out.

Radius of 1.666666667 feet, or 20 inches sound right?
No it is not correct. Your given numbers have only 2 significant digits, how can you claim 10 digits? The correct answer should be 1.7 ft.

Copying all the digits which show up on your calculator is a very bad habit. Learn to give answers which reflect the significant digits of the problem.
 
Oh yeah, sorry I was talking about inches.
 
Integral said:
No it is not correct. Your given numbers have only 2 significant digits, how can you claim 10 digits? The correct answer should be 1.7 ft.

Copying all the digits which show up on your calculator is a very bad habit. Learn to give answers which reflect the significant digits of the problem.

He said "20 inches" which is to two significant figures!

GJBenn85: If you are taking calculus, you certainly should be able to solve and equation like s= rθ for r! I'm glad you wer able to figure it out.
 
HallsofIvy said:
GJBenn85: If you are taking calculus, you certainly should be able to solve and equation like s= rθ for r! .

I know. It was a case of me trying to turn a simple problem into a more complex one. For some reason, I was thinking i had to convert the 1.8 radians into something else. Simple things smack me in the face. :)
 
HallsofIvy said:
He said "20 inches" which is to two significant figures!
GJBenn85: If you are taking calculus, you certainly should be able to solve and equation like s= rθ for r! I'm glad you wer able to figure it out.


... not to split hairs .. but ...
20 inches has 1 significant figure
20. inches has 2 significant figures

PLUS .. many math classes don't require significant figures.. and if they do then the person has it so hammered into their head that they'd shudder at thinking about it .. AND .. writing all the digits from a calculator is a GOOD thing unless you're at a FINAL answer, and since there are most definitely 12 in / 1 ft, (a definition) ... then had the person done 1.7 ft it would be off and what if the measurements were given as exact values? ... values found in a theoretical sense of perfect measurements
 
  • #10
stmoe said:
... not to split hairs .. but ...
20 inches has 1 significant figure
20. inches has 2 significant figures
PLUS .. many math classes don't require significant figures.. and if they do then the person has it so hammered into their head that they'd shudder at thinking about it .. AND .. writing all the digits from a calculator is a GOOD thing unless you're at a FINAL answer, and since there are most definitely 12 in / 1 ft, (a definition) ... then had the person done 1.7 ft it would be off and what if the measurements were given as exact values? ... values found in a theoretical sense of perfect measurements

Sometimes it is according to the teachers. Mine say three sigfigs, unless it specifically says different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
892
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K