What Is the Reflection Coefficient for Electrons at a Potential Step?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickmai123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Reflection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The reflection coefficient for electrons encountering a potential step from V = 0 to V = V_0, where the total energy E is greater than V_0, is determined using the probability flux equations. The relevant equations include the probability flux S(x,t) and the reflection coefficient R, defined as R = S_{I}^{-x}(x,t) / S_{I}^{+x}(x,t). To find R, it is essential to ensure continuity of the wavefunction and its derivative at the potential boundary (x=0), which allows for the calculation of the necessary constants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics principles, particularly wavefunctions and potential steps
  • Understanding of probability flux in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation for piecewise potentials
  • Learn about the continuity conditions for wavefunctions at potential boundaries
  • Explore the concept of transmission coefficients in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of reflection and transmission in quantum tunneling
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on wave-particle interactions and potential barriers, will benefit from this discussion.

nickmai123
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the reflection coefficient for electrons traveling toward a potential change from V to V_0 with a total energy E > V_0.
The potential diagram is just a unit step function. It goes from V = 0 to V = V_0 at x=0. In piecewise notation:
<br /> \begin{displaymath}<br /> V(x) = \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{lr}<br /> 0 &amp; : x &lt; 0 \\<br /> V_0 &amp; : x \ge 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right.<br /> \end{displaymath}<br />
The piecewise notation does not account for the V(x) being continuous at x=0.



Homework Equations


a) Probability flux:
S\left( x,t \right)=-\frac{i\hbar}{2m}\left[ \Psi^*\left( x,t \right) \frac{\partial \Psi\left( x,t \right)}{\partial x} - \Psi\left( x,t \right) \frac{\partial \Psi^*\left( x,t \right)}{\partial x}\left]

b) Reflection coefficient:
R=\frac{S_{I}^{-x}\left( x,t \right)}{S_{I}^{+x}\left( x,t \right)}

The Attempt at a Solution


I've solved for the wave equations at x &gt; 0 and x &lt; 0. I'm stuck as far as where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking for help on (a)? Can you also show us your final wave function? And have you tried plugging that wavefunction into (a)?
 
nickmai123 said:

Homework Statement


Find the reflection coefficient for electrons traveling toward a potential change from V to V_0 with a total energy E &gt; V_0.
The potential diagram is just a unit step function. It goes from V = 0 to V = V_0 at x=0. In piecewise notation:
<br /> \begin{displaymath}<br /> V(x) = \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{lr}<br /> 0 &amp; : x &lt; 0 \\<br /> V_0 &amp; : x \ge 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right.<br /> \end{displaymath}<br />
The piecewise notation does not account for the V(x) being continuous at x=0.



Homework Equations


a) Probability flux:
S\left( x,t \right)=-\frac{i\hbar}{2m}\left[ \Psi^*\left( x,t \right) \frac{\partial \Psi\left( x,t \right)}{\partial x} - \Psi\left( x,t \right) \frac{\partial \Psi^*\left( x,t \right)}{\partial x}\left]

b) Reflection coefficient:
R=\frac{S_{I}^{-x}\left( x,t \right)}{S_{I}^{+x}\left( x,t \right)}

The Attempt at a Solution


I've solved for the wave equations at x &gt; 0 and x &lt; 0. I'm stuck as far as where to go from there.
Require continuity of the wavefunction and its derivative at x=0. That will allow you to solve for most of the constants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K