What is the relationship between De Broglie frequency and energy in QM and QFT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChAshutosh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    De broglie
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between De Broglie frequency and energy in quantum mechanics (QM) and quantum field theory (QFT). Participants explore various interpretations and implications of De Broglie's concepts, including the treatment of energy types and the compatibility of classical and relativistic ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the De Broglie wavelength and frequency equations, suggesting a relationship between frequency and kinetic energy, but questions arise regarding the completeness of this view.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that kinetic energy is the only relevant energy type in the context of wave motion.
  • A participant argues that De Broglie's ideas mix quantum and relativistic concepts, suggesting they are outdated and not fully applicable to modern physics.
  • There is a proposal to consider additional energy contributions from simple harmonic motion (SHM) alongside kinetic energy to derive a different energy relationship.
  • Some participants express confusion about the application of SHM concepts and their relevance to the discussion of De Broglie's theory.
  • One participant highlights the distinction between energy formulations in QM and QFT, noting that they are based on different transformation principles (Galilean vs. Lorentz).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the interpretation of De Broglie's theory, the types of energy involved, and the relevance of classical mechanics to quantum frameworks. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note inconsistencies in De Broglie's theory, particularly regarding the wavelength of stationary particles and the application of classical energy equations in quantum contexts. There is also a lack of clarity on the definitions and implications of terms used in the discussion.

ChAshutosh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As we know de broglie wavelength is λ = h/p and f = E/h
λ = h/p
v/f = h/mv as f*λ=v

then

f = mv^2/h

but it should f = E/h and E=1/2*mv^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say $$E= \frac{1}{2} mv^2 $$ you are considering only kinetic energy, do you think that, it is the only type of energy the body has, whose wave motion is also being is considered?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChAshutosh
Remember De-Broglies ideas are a mishmash of quantum and relatvistic ideas. Best to forget about them - they have long since been consigned to the dustbin of history. But since its relatvistic E is not the classical 1/2 mv^2:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/debrog.html

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChAshutosh
Bhobba, is there noway of achieving E = mv² by adding the energy due to SHM of each particle along the wave, to the KE?
 
Suraj M said:
Bhobba, is there noway of achieving E = mv² by adding the energy due to SHM of each particle along the wave, to the KE?

I don't know what you mean by that.

Like most I have read about the De-Broglie theory and seen the equations. They are an inconsistent mish-mash eg what's the wavelength of a stationary particle - and by frame jumping you can always go to a frame where its stationary. Because of that I tend to not get worried about manipulations involving them - it's wrong anyway.

In QM the KE of a free particle is 1/2 mV^2 where V is the velocity operator.

Interestingly one can actually prove that from symmetry in QM - but that is another story.

Thanks
Bill
 
bhobba said:
I don't know what you mean by that.
I mean the particles would have an extra amount of energy of ##½m \omega^2 A^2## can we use that?
 
Suraj M said:
I mean the particles would have an extra amount of energy of ##½m \omega^2 A^2## can we use that?

You lost me.

Can you explain what your terms mean?

Thanks
Bill
 
The regular SHM terms! ##\omega## = 2##\pi /T## ; A = amplitude of the wave
 
I think you are trying to introduce concepts from the quantum harmonic occilator used in QFT. QFT is a whole new ball game not compatible with ordinary QM.

The energy in QM is actually based on the Galilaen transformations while QFT is based on the Lorentz transformations.

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K