What is the relationship between Earth's rotation and its mass?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kernelpenguin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Rotation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between Earth's rotation and its mass, specifically in the context of weight loss by individuals. It is established that while shedding mass may intuitively suggest a change in rotational speed, the Earth operates as a closed system regarding mass. The argument highlights that although the Earth receives energy from sunlight and radiates heat, these processes do not significantly alter its mass in a way that affects rotation. The concept of angular momentum conservation is emphasized, indicating that mass redistribution closer to the axis can increase spin rate, akin to a figure skater pulling in their arms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum conservation
  • Basic knowledge of closed systems in physics
  • Familiarity with thermal equilibrium concepts
  • Awareness of mass-energy equivalence principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of angular momentum in closed systems
  • Explore the effects of mass redistribution on rotational dynamics
  • Study thermal equilibrium and its implications for planetary bodies
  • Investigate the greenhouse effect and its impact on Earth's energy balance
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of planetary rotation and mass interactions.

kernelpenguin
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
On the UserFriendly forums I saw a message a few days ago from two people that had lost some weight. It went something like: "If you've noticed that the Earth is spinning faster, it's because X and Y have lost N pounds!"

Okay, logically, an object should start spinning faster if it sheds some mass, but does it, in this case, shed any mass at all?

I got into a debate about this with my friend.

My point of view is that the Earth is a closed system when it comes to particles with mass. Even if they did lose N pounds, that still hasn't left Earth or its atmosphere, so Earth should be spinning at exactly the same speed.

His point of view was that Earth is not a closed system since it gets sunlight and sheds heat radiation. But these shouldn't affect mass, should they? Then he went on saying that some of it is deposited in the atmosphere and thus doesn't contribute to Earth's rotation.

It's a fun little problem, methinks. Anyone care to cast their opinions? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget to think in terms of mass distribution too, not just total mass! Is the rotation of the Earth the same once someone has sweated off 1 pound? Or has eaten a carrot that was underground?
 
This is like the stereotypical ice sk8er problem, but instead of arms and legs moving in toward the center, is it not(X and Y)
 
In a closed system, it is not the spin that is conserved, but the angular momentum. Therefore, if mass is re-distributed to be closer to the axis, the spin rate will increase. Like a skater pulling his arms in.
 
Earth is not a closed system, and does indeed receive sunlight and radiate heat. This will have an effect on the overall mass of the planet because the lost weight was lost as calories burned by biological activity. This mass was converted to heat, which can leave the Earth and its atmosphere.
 
Earth also radiates just because of its temperature, as anybody does. It doesn't require biology to do that. Indeed the Earth can be seen as a system in near thermal equilibrium, losing as much heat by radiation as it gains from insolation. If the greenhouse effect prevents heat from being radiated, it will reach equilibrium at a higher temperature, as has happened to Venus.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K