What is the relationship between epsilon and sigma in multi-ferroic materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nickpga
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intro
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between epsilon (strain) and sigma (stress) in multi-ferroic materials, particularly in the context of mechanical properties and equilibrium conditions. Participants explore how different materials respond under stress and the implications of varying displacements and forces at their boundaries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of differing calculated stresses and question the assumption that both materials experience the same displacement. They explore the physical meaning of stress differences at material boundaries and the conditions for equilibrium.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been provided regarding the conditions of equilibrium and the relationship between stress and strain. Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, questioning their understanding, and clarifying definitions and equations related to stress and strain.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions of stress and strain, as well as the equations governing their relationship. Participants express a need for clarity on these concepts and their application in the context of multi-ferroic materials.

Nickpga
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
1D mechanical bar. Two different materials that clamped at x = 0. both are isotropic and perfectly bonded together. Young's modulus E1 = 10GPa and E2 = 50GPa. displacement of 2um at x = 2mm

Find the stresses, strains and displacements in each of the bars.
Plot the energy per unit volume in material 1 as a function of the Young's modulus in material 1, for five cases. E = 1, ,5, 10, 25 and 50
Relevant Equations
Epsilon (stress) = sigma (strain) / E (young's modulus)
du (displacement)/ dx = * E = strain
I have a TA that is ignoring me, so I have to resort to this online forum. Also, a very unhelpful example from lecture (just 1).
I have some other equations, but I don't really know how they all tie together.

I find epsilon = 10um/1mm (both materials are 1 mm in length) = 1E-2mm/mm
sigma 2 = E1*epsilon = 50E7Pa
sigma 1 = E2*epsilon = 10E7Pa

As far as the second part, I thought I did something reasonable, but after rereading it, I realized I missed a crucial part of the problem.
I can provide anything else that you may want to help me understand this homework (in context) since I don't have anyone to explain it to me. Other than the lectures which are very unhelpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the fact that your calculated stresses are different imply?
 
caz said:
What does the fact that your calculated stresses are different imply?
That my assumption that both materials receive the same displacement, may be wrong?
 
Yes. Think about a hard spring and a soft spring in series. If you pull it, the soft spring will extend more.

If the stresses are different at the boundary between the materials, what happens to the boundary?
 
Last edited:
caz said:
Stress times cross sectional area is force. So at the boundary between the two materials, the forces are different. What does this mean physically?
That the stress is different between each material?
 
I edited my previous comment.

What happens to the boundary if the stresses are different?
 
caz said:
I edited my previous comment.

What happens to the boundary if the stresses are different?
oh. ok. now i am starting to catch on. (i am way better at programming than i ever will be at mechanics).
so the total displacement is 10um, but that is distributed between both materials?
 
Yes, the displacements are not equally distributed.
 
The system is at equilibrium. What does that say about the forces of the boundary?
 
  • #10
caz said:
The system is at equilibrium. What does that say about the forces of the boundary?
Wouldnt that imply that the forces are the same? Or would that be the strain that is the same?
 
  • #11
At equilibrium, the boundary does not move. The is means the net force is 0. This means that the stresses are identical in both materials.

Using this condition, do you see what you need to do?
 
  • #12
caz said:
At equilibrium, the boundary does not move. The is means the net force is 0. This means that the stresses are identical in both materials.
didnt we say that the stresses are different? oh nvm. it was more of a question.
 
  • #13
If you assume that the stresses are identical, do you see how to do the calculation?
Do you understand why they are identical?
 
  • #14
caz said:
If you assume that the stresses are identical, do you see how to do the calculation?
Do you understand why they are identical?
I am confused on how you they are in equilibrium
 
  • #15
Nothing is moving. Therefore there are no accelerations. Therefore there are no net forces.

At the boundary between the materials, each material is pulling the boundary towards itself with a force equal to the stress times the cross-sectional area. (Check your text on how to get the directions correct). This means that the stresses are identical.

Do you understand?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nickpga
  • #16
Alright. That makes sense. I suppose I had an imaginary force that caused the displacement. Like someone pulling it
 
  • #17
Yes.

So dtotal=dmat1+dmat2 with the condition that the stresses are identical for mat1 and mat2. Do you see where to go from here?
 
  • #18
Btw, your relevant equation for stress is wrong and you use two different lengths for the total displacement in your first post.
 
  • #19
caz said:
Btw, your relevant equation for stress is wrong and you use two different lengths for the total displacement in your first post.
really? stress = strain/ Y_modulus? Thats the equation the professor boxed and starred
 
  • #20
Stress(sigma)=strain(epsilon)*Y
(Y and stress have the same units)
 
  • #21
caz said:
Stress(sigma)=strain(epsilon)*Y
(Y and stress have the same units)
You know. Thats what happens when the professor can't be be bothered to write legibly. I thought stress was epsilon. and strain sigma.
 
  • #22
The other equation you need is strain=dl/l
 
  • #23
caz said:
The other equation you need is strain=dl/l
I have that one too. I just had it wrong. Thanks a lot for your time and effort in asking me questions to make my mind work.
I wouldn't say I am dumb, I just don't have a mind that thinks 'mechanically'.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #24
Your welcome. New concepts take time to absorb. Be patient.

You seem to know what to do now so I’ll be signing off.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Nickpga

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K