Material Science, Material Selection Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around material selection for a rocket fuel tank designed for space tourism, specifically focusing on fracture toughness and material indices M1 and M2. The user calculated M1 using the formula M1 = K_{IC}/E to maximize fracture toughness under displacement-limited design, and M2 as M2 = K_{IC}^2/E for energy-limited failure. The user encountered issues with the CES materials selection program, which only provided polymer options instead of the required two composites and two polymers. The user seeks validation of their calculations and guidance on achieving the desired material selection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fracture toughness and its significance in material selection
  • Familiarity with material indices M1 and M2 in engineering design
  • Proficiency in using the CES materials selection program
  • Knowledge of stress-strain relationships and their application in material science
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of fracture mechanics and its application in material selection
  • Learn how to effectively utilize the CES materials selection program for composite materials
  • Study the relationship between stress-strain curves and material toughness
  • Investigate alternative materials that meet the specified indices M1 > 10 and M2 > 0.25
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, aerospace engineers, and students involved in material selection for high-performance applications, particularly in the aerospace sector.

mathwurkz
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with this homework. Please have a look at my work and see if it checks out.
ROCKET FUEL TANK
A company has asked you to help their business in space tourism. They have designed a rocket that will be powered by nitrous oxide (reacted with rubber), and you are to select materials for the fuel tank (pressure vessel).
a) Considering the flight will be at high altitude (the edge of space), suggest materials that will have a good fracture toughness low temperature. THe M1 index should consider brittle failure under a displacement-limited design. Find materials with M1 > 10.
b) To increase passenger safety and spacecraft performance, consider M2 a second material index for energy-limited failure under fracture at minimum mass. Hint: Recall that toughness is the integral of the stress-strain curve (energy), and find an index that will maximize fracture toughness.
M2 > 0.25 required.
We are given 4 formulas.
\sigma = \frac{S_f pR}{2t}, \epsilon= \frac{\sigma}{E}, K_{IC}= C\sigma _f \sqrt{\pi a}, U= \frac{1 \sigma}{2 E}
For part a), this is how I solved it.
\sigma = \frac{K_{IC}}{C \sqrt{\pi a)}}, divide both sides by E., we know, \frac{\sigma}{E} = \frac{\Delta l}{l}, so substituting gives me, \Delta l = \frac{l K_{IC}}{CE \sqrt{\pi a}}
all in all...
\Delta l = \left[ \frac{1}{C \sqrt{\pi a}}\right] \left[l\right]\left[ \frac{K_{IC}}{E}\right] so...
M_1 = \frac{K_{IC}}{E} to maximize the fracture toughness, under displacement-limited design.
b) U = \frac{1\sigma ^2}{2E} = \frac{1}{2E} \frac{K_{IC}^2}{C \sqrt{\pi a}}
so i get...
M_2 = \frac{K_{IC}^2}{E}
The problem is when I go to the CES materials selection program. The index I have for part a ends up dominating and gives me a small list of materials. The problem is the next part of the problem tells us that parts a and b should have made our selections come down to 2 composites and 2 polymers. But what I end up getting from the program are just polymers. All the composites are below the slope line on the materials selection chart. So at this point, I am thinking that I must have misinterpreted the question wrong, got a wrong material index, or maybe the program is all buggy. If anyone can check what I am doing or even can tell me if my indicies do yield 2 composites and 2 polymers i'd appreciate it. THanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't have CES available on this machine, but somehow for the 2nd index I would've used (intuitively before reading it completely) the integral of the stress-strain curve itself, but your question does state to go with fracture toughness on this as well (and if you've linear-elasticity going there would suggest even more so ... although fracture toughness will be maximized also if you just maximize the area under the stress-strain curve). So would've thought it reasonable to maximize fracture toughness and energy the structure can take without connecting the two.
Probably doesn't change anything but thought I'd mention if you want to try it as a criterion, but don't see anything 'wrong' in the way you've interpreted the question itself. Puzzling :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K