What is the Role of a Mathematical Physicist?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role and purpose of a mathematical physicist, exploring the intersection of mathematics and physics, particularly in relation to education, career paths, and the nature of nonlinear dynamics. Participants share their perspectives on the qualifications needed for a career in this field and the distinctions between mathematical physicists and theoretical physicists.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Mahmoud expresses interest in becoming a mathematical physicist but is uncertain about the path and purpose of this role.
  • One participant suggests that a degree is generally necessary for a career in R&D or academia, noting that self-taught individuals may face challenges in teaching due to potential frustrations with students.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of obtaining research or internship experience during undergraduate studies and maintaining good relationships with professors for recommendations.
  • There is a discussion about nonlinear dynamics, with Mahmoud questioning whether it fits more into mathematical physics or applied mathematics.
  • One participant clarifies that nonlinear dynamics is pursued by both physicists and applied mathematicians and highlights the broad applicability of the subject across various physics domains.
  • A distinction is made between mathematical physicists and theoretical physicists, with some participants arguing that mathematical physicists focus on making physical theories more rigorous, while theoretical physicists may prioritize the development of physical theories themselves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact definition of a mathematical physicist, with differing views on the relationship between mathematical physicists and theoretical physicists. There is also no agreement on the necessity of formal education versus self-teaching in this field.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the varying definitions of mathematical physicists and theoretical physicists, indicating that these definitions may depend on individual perspectives. The discussion also highlights the potential limitations of self-taught education beyond certain levels.

SpanishOmelette
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
probably, I am a home-utored student(self-teaching!) and I'm seeking a little help.

While I am drawn to MANY forms of physics or mathematics, the mathematical physicist seems to be the ticket. But I am not sure.

I was just wondering if this would be a good way to go, and what exactly is the purpose of the mathematical physicist?

Blessings,
Mahmoud.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally works for large corporation (R&D or applied mathematics) or University (teaching), unless you are gifted on the order of world class. Your statement of self-taught would generally indicate you may not survive teaching (you may end up disgusted with students who need to much help when you know with effort they could do it, after all, you did).

Where are you at in your studies? It is hard to become good at something without some interaction.

In the US, home schooling is common for up to the High school level. However, I don't believe it serves the student well much past Junior high. Many Home schooled students are superior students up to and including High School, but at the High school level, they can only progress so far. Key concepts are sometimes missing in their education, and there is no way for them to discover their shortcomings.
 
Hmm ok. So, degree would be needed?

R&D sounds pretty good though. I am just inspired by both Mathematis and physics, so I though this would be the perfect match.

Thanks for quick reply.

Jsut as a side-note, where does dynamics of non-linear systems (I.E. Chaos) fit in? M. Physics or A. Mathematics?

Thankyou.
Mahmoud.
 
R&D can be misleadingly glamorous when you first hear about it. Here's a vague glimpse at how mathematics might be used in industry: http://www.maa.org/mathematics-and-operations-research-in-industry

At some point you will need credentials to get into either industry or academia. A simple B.S. degree in Math, Physics, or Computer Science will suffice to get you to the next level (provided that you work hard and solve problems well). I would use the time during your B.S. degree to get research experience or internship experience, starting with your 2nd year. You will usually need to become acquainted with your professors before you can get involved in their research, which means taking classes in the subjects that you are interested in and doing well in them. Take as many classes as possible in every subject that interests you; this way you will be able to refine your interests.

Keep these four questions in mind during your undergraduate experience:
1) how can I get research and/or internship experience?
2) who will write me the most effective letters of recommendation? how will I earn their respect?
3) how can I keep my grades at a top level?
4) what tests or credentials are required upon graduation in order to be admitted to grad school or to get a job?

After your bachelors degree, the next level is either an entry level position at a company (where you likely will not use very much math), or a graduate degree in one of the three subjects listed above. After either an MS or a PhD, you will have the credentials to get into a job where you might use mathematics and/or physics, though it probably will be on a very specific subject with a very specific skill-set. If you maintain a wide variety of math/physics interests, a professorship will likely allow you to study the interesting things; however, an industry job will allow you to make more money.

SpanishOmelette said:
Jsut as a side-note, where does dynamics of non-linear systems (I.E. Chaos) fit in? M. Physics or A. Mathematics?
Nonlinear dynamics is a broad subject that is difficult to penetrate deeply. At the forefront of modern research, nonlinear dynamics can be incorporated into just about every physics subject. It requires a very strong background in physics, calculus, statistics, differential equations, and numerical methods/computation.
 
Nonlinear dynamics is actively pursued by physicists and applied mathematicians.

To address your question about what an actual mathematical physicist is, this depends upon your definition of the term, which varies from individual to individual. Some people consider theoretical physicists and mathematical physicists to be identical. I personally view them differently. Mathematical physicists are mathematicians who work on physical theories, typically with the purpose of making the underlying mathematics more rigorous. Weyl and von Neumann are famous examples of this. The focus was on the mathematics; neither Neumann or Weyl really made direct contributions to physics (that I know of, I'm no historian). Theoretical physicists are more like Einstein; Einstein worked on the physical theories themselves, which are somewhat more qualitative, and was not as interested in or as skilled in the mathematics. Special relativity arises from pondering the physics and Einstein taking the philosophical stance that the laws of physics should hold in all reference frames; much of the physics here can be characterized without any mathematics, although of course the mathematics is vital at some point. By contrast, the Hilbert space formalism arises from, among other things, questions about how one can represent mathematically the state of a quantum system (in this case as a point in Hilbert space)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 209 ·
7
Replies
209
Views
19K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K