What Is the Role of Gauge Theory in Particle Physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of gauge theory in particle physics, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulation of gauge transformations, connections on bundles, and their implications for particle representation in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. Participants explore concepts such as the internal structure associated with U(1) and the relationship between gauge theory and electromagnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the mathematical formulation of Maxwell's equations using differential forms and connections on bundles, noting the transformation properties of the potential A under gauge transformations.
  • Another participant questions the specific internal structure related to U(1) and its implications for particle representation, suggesting that U(1) may refer to local phase in the context of gauge theory.
  • There is a discussion about the representation of particles by wave functions in quantum mechanics and the transition to quantum field theory, with a note that this transition complicates the relationship between wave functions and operators.
  • Participants discuss the invariance of probability density under phase transformations and the necessity for the gauge connection A to remain invariant under local phase changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations of the internal structure associated with U(1) and the implications for gauge theory. There is no consensus on the exact nature of these relationships, and the discussion remains open-ended with multiple viewpoints presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of transitioning from wave functions to operators in quantum field theory, indicating that the discussion may involve unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions about the nature of gauge transformations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying gauge theory, particle physics, and the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics, particularly individuals looking for insights into the interplay between mathematics and physical concepts in these fields.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Hi everyone,

So I recently read a chapter in a math book that vaguely describe how connections on bundles occur in particle physics, but they are very cryptic about the physics part and I just want to know a little bit more about it. So I'll tell you what I read and then follow up with some questions I have.

The way the text is structured, they start by making the observation that by defining a real-valued differential 2-form F on R^4 in a certain way in terms of the components of the E and B fields, Maxwell's equations take the elegant form dF=d*F=0. Then they remark that if one writes F=dA by virtue of Poincaré's lemma, then the "potential" A is defined up to the addition of an exact 1-form df which we may write d(ln(g))=g^{-1}dg for g=e^f. In particular, by commutativity, the "gauge transformation" A\mapsto A+df can be written A\mapsto g^{-1}Ag+g^{-1}dg which we recognize as the way the connection 1-forms of a connection on a line bundle transform under a change of local trivialisation with transition function g:\mathbb{R}^4\rightarrow \mathbb{K}^*. As to F, it can be written F=dA+A\wedge A since the exterior product of real-valued 1-forms vanish. As such, we recognize F as the curvature 2-form of the connection.

Here, the line bundle could be real, or it could be complex with structure group U(1). In this case, we admit that A and F are really i\mathbb{R}-valued.

In the more general context of a connection on a vector bundle with (matrix) structure group G on a space-time 4-manifold M, the Maxwell equation dF=0 becomes dF = F\wedge A - A\wedge F, or, regarding F as the curvature form of the corresponding principal G-bundle, DF=0, where D stands for exterior covariant differentiation. The other Maxwell equation d*F=0 generalizes to D*F=0 and this is called the Yang-Mills equation.

I also read on wikipedia that in the standard model, the structure group G is U(1)\times SU(2)\times SU(3) where each one of these 3 groups is a symetry group for some "internal structure" that a particle may have.

K so what is the internal structure that is related to U(1) exactly?

How do particles enter the picture? Are particles assumed to be represented by a wave function \psi:M\rightarrow\mathbb{C} as in QM? Is U(1) related to the fact that the probability density |\psi|^2 is invariant under phase transformation \psi\mapsto e^{i\phi}\psi ?? But then what is the relationship with the EM field?!

PS I only have an undergraduate background in physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which is the book? This is a technical subject not easily found. I also look for a clear account of fiber bundle formulation of classical field theory.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Postnikov's Leçons de géométrie différentielle. I am not sure the text exists other than in russian and french.
 
quasar987 said:
K so what is the internal structure that is related to U(1) exactly?
U(1) may refer to global phase or to local phase, but in this context of "internal structure" in physics it usually refers to the local phase and it is the structure group that corresponds to the fiber in the principal bundle that has ##A## as principal connection.
How do particles enter the picture? Are particles assumed to be represented by a wave function \psi:M\rightarrow\mathbb{C} as in QM?
When switching to QFT things are more involved, there is a step from wavefunctions to operators.

Is U(1) related to the fact that the probability density |\psi|^2 is invariant under phase transformation \psi\mapsto e^{i\phi}\psi ?? But then what is the relationship with the EM field?!
Yes, but note that ##\phi## is not constant here but dependent on spacetime position, this is what makes the phase local, just as the wave function is invariant under phase changes independently of spacetime point, the connection ##A##(substitute the scalar and vector potentials in the case of the Schrödinger equation in the presence of an EM field) must also be invariant to the change of local phase, thus called gauge connection.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K