I What is the significance of the Lande g-factor in nuclear physics?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter teroenza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5
Looking at the Wikipedia page for the Lande g-factor, I'm a bit confused. I thought that g_I\approx5.585, that of the proton, but then there is the line saying that
This last approximation is justified because g_I is smaller than g_j by the ratio of the electron mass to the proton mass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landé_g-factor

It makes sense that the nuclear and Bohr magnetons would differ by the mass ratio, but I thought g_s \approx 2, g_L=1, and g_I\approx5.585. Then the additional factors in the Lande calculation would account for the different J,S,F.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that the Wiki page is discussing atoms rather than nucleii.
 
You're right. I was confusing the nuclear g-factor of a proton with the nuclear g-factor of an atom.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top