What is the Smallest Object Ever Seen with a Microscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flatland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microscope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of what is the smallest object ever observed with a microscope, focusing on the nature of "seeing" in a scientific context. Participants explore various types of microscopes, the limitations of resolution, and the criteria for what constitutes a "real" image.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the definition of a "real" image, debating whether images produced by electrons or other particles qualify as such.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of visible light in microscopy, with a mention of the resolution limit of approximately 1 micron.
  • Some participants assert that individual atoms have been observed, while others express skepticism about the ability to "see" atoms in a meaningful way.
  • One participant mentions that the smallest actual image taken is a single strand of DNA using an electron microscope, seeking visual evidence.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of colors in electron microscope images, with some stating that color is digitally added and does not represent true colors.
  • Participants discuss the concept of "seeing" and how it may become meaningless below certain limits, suggesting that there is no definitive smallest observable object.
  • Some participants provide links to images of small objects, including ions and atoms, while noting that these images may not represent true color and involve complex measurement techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on what constitutes "seeing" and what the smallest observable object is. Participants express differing opinions on the criteria for visibility and the nature of images produced by various microscopy techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the ambiguity in defining "seeing" and the challenges in observing objects at quantum scales. There are references to the disruptive nature of certain measurement techniques, which complicate the ability to visualize smaller objects.

  • #31
From quantum mechanics, you can't really "see" an electron cloud... particularly, not all parts of the cloud are really even occupied... the cloud just represents the probability density of an electron actually being there.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
http://www.insidescience.org/research/first_detailed_photos_of_atoms

here is the closest thing to what you are looking for that I could find...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
This is not better result than IBM single atoms mentioned earlier. Well - it is new in terms of them being able to picture organic matter, I think IBM worked on metal surfaces, but the resolution sounds to be about the same.
 
  • #35
Hi there,

It looks like that nobody before IBM or those guys at UCLA has ever seen how an atom looks like :)

Does it mean that obtaining real images of atoms is quite a recent achievement?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 232 ·
8
Replies
232
Views
22K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K