What is the Smallest Object Ever Seen with a Microscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flatland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microscope
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around identifying the most powerful microscope capable of producing actual images, specifically focusing on the smallest observable objects. It highlights the limitations of visible light microscopy, which can only resolve features down to about 1 micron. Electron microscopy is emphasized as a method that can capture images of smaller entities, such as individual atoms and DNA strands, although these images are often digitally colored and not true representations of color. The conversation also touches on the concept of "seeing," where the definition becomes ambiguous at the quantum level, as traditional imaging techniques struggle to depict features like electron clouds. Notably, images of single atoms and structures at the nanoscale have been achieved using advanced techniques like Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) and ion trapping, but the interpretation of what constitutes a "real image" remains debated. Ultimately, while scientists have imaged atoms and their arrangements, the challenge lies in the meaningfulness of "seeing" at such small scales, where conventional definitions of visibility may not apply.
  • #31
From quantum mechanics, you can't really "see" an electron cloud... particularly, not all parts of the cloud are really even occupied... the cloud just represents the probability density of an electron actually being there.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
http://www.insidescience.org/research/first_detailed_photos_of_atoms

here is the closest thing to what you are looking for that I could find...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
This is not better result than IBM single atoms mentioned earlier. Well - it is new in terms of them being able to picture organic matter, I think IBM worked on metal surfaces, but the resolution sounds to be about the same.
 
  • #35
Hi there,

It looks like that nobody before IBM or those guys at UCLA has ever seen how an atom looks like :)

Does it mean that obtaining real images of atoms is quite a recent achievement?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 232 ·
8
Replies
232
Views
21K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K